New insights on the persistence and reproduction of educational inequality and injustice: towards a synthesis of Nussbaum's capabilities approach and Bourdieu's theories

Alison MacKenzie*, Tien-Hui Chiang, Allen Thurston

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
87 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Education is one of the most powerful means by which to advance equality, equity, and justice, yet it is also one of the most powerful mechanisms by which inequality, inequity and injustice are reproduced. Although academics have developed various ways for understanding these phenomena, the dichotomy between agency and structuralism persists, and is often regulated by people's capabilities ‘to do and to be’, and the social and psychological constraints on agency. These shortcomings have stimulated us to reconsider their interactions. The aim is to explore how we may more insightfully understand the mechanisms that reproduce injustice and inequality in education by bringing together sociology and normative philosophy using Martha Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach and the theories of Pierre Bourdieu.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102032
JournalInternational Journal of Educational Research
Volume115
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Educational inequality and injustice
  • Capabilities Approach
  • structural constraint
  • M. Nussbaum
  • P. Bourdieu

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'New insights on the persistence and reproduction of educational inequality and injustice: towards a synthesis of Nussbaum's capabilities approach and Bourdieu's theories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this