Abstract
The ‘rate‐of‐living’ theory predicts that life expectancy is a negative function of the rates at which organisms metabolize. According to this theory, factors that accelerate metabolic rates, such as high body temperature and active foraging, lead to organismic ‘wear‐out’. This process reduces life span through an accumulation of biochemical errors and the build‐up of toxic metabolic by‐products. Although the rate‐of‐living theory is a keystone underlying our understanding of life‐history trade‐offs, its validity has been recently questioned. The rate‐of‐living theory has never been tested on a global scale in a phylogenetic framework, or across both endotherms and ectotherms. Here, we test several of its fundamental predictions across the tetrapod tree of life.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 857-884 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | Global Ecology & Biogeography |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 14 Feb 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2020 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'No evidence for the “rate-of-living” theory across the tetrapod tree of life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Daniel Pincheira-Donoso
- School of Biological Sciences - Senior Lecturer
- Institute for Global Food Security
Person: Academic