No tyranny for failing Donald Trump – sad! Law, constitutionalism and tyranny in the twenty-first century

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Donald Trump’s presidency resulted in several accusations of tyrannical intent. The end of his term of office, and particularly the rioting of 6 January 2021 and the denial of the presidential election results, did little to dispel those accusations. Tyranny, while perhaps not fashionable as a basis of analysis, has a long-intertwined relationship with law and constitutionalism. This article uses Donald Trump’s presidency to consider the relationships between tyranny, tyrannicide, law and constitutionalism. The article considers law and constitutionalism’s role in both preventing and advancing the advent of tyranny and examines their limitations in stopping tyrannical intent. Public contestation is put forward as an equally significant bulwark against the advent of tyranny, but also a space under tremendous pressure during Donald Trump’s presidency.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)480-509
Number of pages20
JournalNorthern Ireland Legal Quarterly
Volume72
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'No tyranny for failing Donald Trump – sad! Law, constitutionalism and tyranny in the twenty-first century'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this