Non-state actors in global climate governance: from Copenhagen to Paris and beyond

K. Bäckstrand, J.W. Kuyper, B. Linnér, E. Lövbrand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

87 Citations (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)561-579
Number of pages19
JournalEnvironmental Politics
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 26 May 2017

Bibliographical note

Cited By :7

Export Date: 19 September 2018

Correspondence Address: Bäckstrand, K.; Department of Political Science, Stockholm UniversitySweden; email:

References: Abbott, K.W., The transnational regime complex for climate change (2012) Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30 (4), pp. 571-590; Allan, J.I., Hadden, J., Exploring the framing power of NGOs in global climate politics (2017) Environmental Politics, 26 (4); Bäckstrand, K., Accountability of networked climate governance: the rise of transnational climate partnerships (2008) Global Environmental Politics, 8 (3), pp. 74-102; Bäckstrand, K., Kronsell, A., (2015) Rethinking the Green State. Environmental governance towards climate and sustainability transitions, , London: Routledge; Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper, J.W., The democratic legitimacy of orchestration: the UNFCCC, non-state actors, and transnational climate governance (2017) Environmental Politics, 26 (4); Bäckstrand, K., Lövbrand, E., (2015) The research handbook on climate governance, , Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; Bang, G., Hovi, J., Skodvin, T., The Paris Agreement: short-term and long-term effectiveness (2016) Politics and Governance, 4 (3), pp. 209-218; Bernauer, T., McGrath, L.F., Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy (2016) Nature Climate Change, 6, pp. 680-683; Betsill, M.M., NGOs (2015) Research handbook on climate governance, pp. 251-261. , Bäckstrand K., Lövbrand E., (eds), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; Betsill, M.M., Corell, E., NGO influence in international environmental negotiations: a framework for analysis (2001) Global Environmental Politics, 1 (4), pp. 65-85; Betsill, M., Building productive links between the UNFCCC and the broader climate governance landscape (2015) Global Environmental Politics, 15 (2), pp. 1-10; Bodansky, D., (2012) The Durban platform: issues and options for a 2015 agreement, , Center for Climate and Energy Solutions; Bodansky, D., Reflections on the Paris Conference (2015) Opinio Juris, ,, Available from, March; Bodansky, D., The legal character of the Paris agreement (2016) Working paper; Börzel, T.A., Risse, T., Effective and legitimate tools of international governance? (2005) Complex sovereignty: on the reconstitution of political authority in the 21st century, pp. 195-216. , Grande E., Pauly L.W., (eds), Toronto: Toronto University Press; Brun, A., Conference diplomacy: the making of the Paris agreement (2016) Politics and Governance, 4 (3), pp. 115-123; Bulkeley, H., (2014) Transnational climate change governance, , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Busby, J., After Paris: good enough climate governance (2016) Current History, , January 3-9; Cabré, M., Issue-linkages to climate change measured through NGO participation in the UNFCCC (2011) Global Environmental Politics, 11 (3), pp. 10-22; Chan, S., Reinvigorating international climate policy: a comprehensive framework for effective nonstate action (2015) Global Policy, 6 (4), pp. 466-473; Chan, S., Strengthening non-state climate action: a progress assessment if commitments launched at the 2014 UN Climate Summit (2015) Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Papers No. 242 and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics; Chan, S., Brandi, C., Bauer, S., Aligning transnational climate action with international climate governance: the road from Paris (2016) Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25 (2), pp. 238-247; Christoff, P., The promissory note: COP21 and the Paris Climate Agreement (2016) Environmental Politics, 25 (5), pp. 765-787; Clémençon, R., The two sides of the Paris Climate Agreement (2016) TheJournal of Environment & Development, 25 (1), pp. 3-24; Cole, D.H., Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy (2015) Nature Climate Change, 5 (2), pp. 114-118; Dimitrov, R.S., The Paris agreement on climate change: behind closed doors (2016) Global Environmental Politics, 16 (3), pp. 1-11; Dryzek, J.S., The meanings of life for non-state actors in climate politics (2017) Environmental Politics, 26 (4); Falkner, R., The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics (2016) International Affairs, 95 (2), pp. 1-28; Fisher, D.R., COP-15 in Copenhagen: how the merging of movements left civil society out in the cold (2010) Global Environmental Politics, 10 (2), pp. 11-17; Fuss, S., Betting on negative emissions (2014) Nature Climate Change, 4, pp. 850-853; Green, J.F., (2014) Rethinking private authority: agents and entrepreneurs in global environmental governance, , Princeton: Princeton University Press; Hadden, J., (2015) Networks in contention: the divisive politics of climate change, , New York: Cambridge University Press; Hale, T., All hands on deck”: the Paris Agreement and non-state climate action (2016) Global Environmental Politics, 16 (3), pp. 12-22; Hickman, T., (2016) Rethinking authority in global climate governance, , London: Routledge; Hoffmann, M.J., (2011) Climate governance at the crossroads: experimenting with a global response after Kyoto, , Oxford: Oxford University Press; Hsu, A., Towards a new climate diplomacy (2015) Nature Climate Change, 5, pp. 501-503; (2014) International cooperation: agreements and instruments in climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Working Group III contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Jordan, A., Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects (2015) Nature Climate Change, 5, pp. 977-982; Kuchler, M., The human rights turn: ENGOs changing tactics in the quest for a more transparent, participatory and accountable CDM (2017) Environmental Politics, 26 (4); Lövbrand, E., Hjerpe, M., Linnér, B.-J., Making climate governance global: how UN climate summitry comes to matter in a complex climate regime (2017) Environmental Politics, 26 (4); Nasiritousi, N., Shapers, brokers and doers: the dynamic roles of non-state actors in global climate change governance (2016) Thesis (PhD), , Linköping University; Nasiritousi, N., Fossil fuel emitters and climate change: unpacking the governance activities of large oil and gas companies (2017) Environmental Politics, 26 (4); Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., Linnér, B.-O., The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: understanding agency through governance profiles (2016) International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16 (1), pp. 109-126; Newell, P., (2000) Climate for change. Non-state actors and the global politics of greenhouse, , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Orr, S., Institutional control and climate change activism at COP21 in Paris (2016) Global Environmental Politics, 16 (3), pp. 23-30; Parker, C., Fragmented climate change leadership: making sense of the ambiguous outcome of COP-15 (2012) Environmental Politics, 21 (2), pp. 268-286; Savaresi, A.-L., The Paris Agreement: a new beginning? (2016) Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 34 (1), pp. 16-26; Schmidt, V.A., Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: input, output and ‘throughput’ (2013) Political Studies, 61 (1), pp. 2-22; Sovacool, B., Linnér, B.-O., Goodsite, M., The political economy of climate adaptation (2015) Nature Climate Change, 5 (7), pp. 616-618; Report of the conference of the parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban Report of the Subsidiary Body for Implementation on its thirty-second session (2010) FCCC/SBI/2010/10. from 31 May to 9 June 2010UNFCCC (2011). Conference of the Parties from 28 November to 11 December 2011, UNFCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1; Paris Agreement (2015) FCCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1; Draft decision -/CP.21 (2015) FCCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1; Synthesis report on the aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions: note by the secretariat (2015) FCCC/CP/2015/7, ,, Available from:; (2015) Technical Annex - Synthesis report on the aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions, ,, Available from:; (2016) Roadmap for global climate action, ,,; van Asselt, H., The role of non-state actors in reviewing in ambition, implementation, and compliance in the Paris Agreement (2016) Climate Law, 6 (1), pp. 91-108; Victor, D.G., (2011) Global warming gridlock: creating more effective strategies for protecting the planet, , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Widerberg, O., The ‘Black Box’ problem of orchestration: how to evaluate the performance of the Lima-Paris Action Agenda (2017) Environmental Politics, 26 (4); Widerberg, O., Pattberg, P., International cooperative initiatives in global climate governance: raising the ambition level or delegitimizing the UNFCCC? (2015) Global Policy, 6 (1), pp. 45-56; Zelli, F., Möller, I., van Asselt, H., Institutional complexity and private authority in global climate governance: the cases of climate engineering, REDD+, and short-lived climate pollutants (2017) Environmental Politics, 26 (4)

Cite this