Nonelectoral Participation in Deeply Divided Societies: Transforming Consociations from the Ground Up?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Premised on elite accommodation, consociations provide little consideration for citizens’ input on institutional change. Likewise, valuable analyses of cross-community political participation in divided societies have emerged in recent years, yet whether the relationship between the grassroot and formal political process has broader consequences remains to be fully explored. The paper examines the conditions in which nonelectoral participation takes place and the ways in which actors involved therein negotiate constraints for continuous cross-community mobilization. The structure of political system and the nature of deep divisions in Northern Ireland and Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovina invite a comparison of the consequences of nonelectoral political participation in these two illustrative case studies. The paper concludes that while the formal political context shapes the likelihood of engagement on cross-community basis, whether nonelectoral participation changes the structure of political decision-making depends on the willingness and ability of those involved to cooperate with formal institutional politics.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNationalities Papers
Publication statusAccepted - 07 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

political participation
participation
political process
political system
society
community
mobilization
political decision making
politics
decision making
institutional change
federation
accommodation
elite
citizen
ability
Participation
Political Participation
comparison

Cite this

@article{42984eb9f406478399a441dd9c261c37,
title = "Nonelectoral Participation in Deeply Divided Societies: Transforming Consociations from the Ground Up?",
abstract = "Premised on elite accommodation, consociations provide little consideration for citizens’ input on institutional change. Likewise, valuable analyses of cross-community political participation in divided societies have emerged in recent years, yet whether the relationship between the grassroot and formal political process has broader consequences remains to be fully explored. The paper examines the conditions in which nonelectoral participation takes place and the ways in which actors involved therein negotiate constraints for continuous cross-community mobilization. The structure of political system and the nature of deep divisions in Northern Ireland and Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovina invite a comparison of the consequences of nonelectoral political participation in these two illustrative case studies. The paper concludes that while the formal political context shapes the likelihood of engagement on cross-community basis, whether nonelectoral participation changes the structure of political decision-making depends on the willingness and ability of those involved to cooperate with formal institutional politics.",
author = "Timofey Agarin",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "7",
language = "English",
journal = "Nationalities Papers",
issn = "0090-5992",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonelectoral Participation in Deeply Divided Societies: Transforming Consociations from the Ground Up?

AU - Agarin, Timofey

PY - 2020/1/7

Y1 - 2020/1/7

N2 - Premised on elite accommodation, consociations provide little consideration for citizens’ input on institutional change. Likewise, valuable analyses of cross-community political participation in divided societies have emerged in recent years, yet whether the relationship between the grassroot and formal political process has broader consequences remains to be fully explored. The paper examines the conditions in which nonelectoral participation takes place and the ways in which actors involved therein negotiate constraints for continuous cross-community mobilization. The structure of political system and the nature of deep divisions in Northern Ireland and Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovina invite a comparison of the consequences of nonelectoral political participation in these two illustrative case studies. The paper concludes that while the formal political context shapes the likelihood of engagement on cross-community basis, whether nonelectoral participation changes the structure of political decision-making depends on the willingness and ability of those involved to cooperate with formal institutional politics.

AB - Premised on elite accommodation, consociations provide little consideration for citizens’ input on institutional change. Likewise, valuable analyses of cross-community political participation in divided societies have emerged in recent years, yet whether the relationship between the grassroot and formal political process has broader consequences remains to be fully explored. The paper examines the conditions in which nonelectoral participation takes place and the ways in which actors involved therein negotiate constraints for continuous cross-community mobilization. The structure of political system and the nature of deep divisions in Northern Ireland and Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovina invite a comparison of the consequences of nonelectoral political participation in these two illustrative case studies. The paper concludes that while the formal political context shapes the likelihood of engagement on cross-community basis, whether nonelectoral participation changes the structure of political decision-making depends on the willingness and ability of those involved to cooperate with formal institutional politics.

M3 - Article

JO - Nationalities Papers

JF - Nationalities Papers

SN - 0090-5992

ER -