Projects per year
Abstract
Background
There is growing recognition of the need for interventions that effectively involve men and boys in interventions to promote family planning behaviours. Research evidence suggests that the most effective behavioural interventions in this field are founded on theoretical principles of behaviour change and gender equality. However, there are few evidence syntheses reporting how theoretical approaches are applied in this context to guide best practice in intervention development. This review sought to address this gap by examining the application and reporting of theories of behaviour change used by family planning interventions involving men and boys.
Methods
We adopted a systematic rapid review approach, scoping findings of a previously reported evidence and gap map of intervention reviews (2007-2018) and supplementing this with publication and grey literature searches for primary research and protocol documents between 2007 and 2020. From 941 non-duplicate records identified, 63 were included for review.
Results
Most records referenced interventions taking place in low- and middle-income countries (65%). There were a wide range of intervention theories of change reported, typically targeting individual-level behaviours and sometimes comprising several behaviour change theories and strategies. The most commonly identified theories were Social Cognitive Theory, Social Learning Theory, the Theory of Planned Behaviour, and the IMB Skills Model. A minority of records explicitly detailed gender-informed elements within their theory of change.
Conclusion
The findings highlight the range of prevailing theories of change used, and the considerable variability in their reporting. Programmers and policy makers would be best served by unified reporting and testing of intervention change theories. There remains a need for consistent reporting of intervention theories of change to better understand precisely how complex interventions involving men and boys in family planning lead to behaviour change.
There is growing recognition of the need for interventions that effectively involve men and boys in interventions to promote family planning behaviours. Research evidence suggests that the most effective behavioural interventions in this field are founded on theoretical principles of behaviour change and gender equality. However, there are few evidence syntheses reporting how theoretical approaches are applied in this context to guide best practice in intervention development. This review sought to address this gap by examining the application and reporting of theories of behaviour change used by family planning interventions involving men and boys.
Methods
We adopted a systematic rapid review approach, scoping findings of a previously reported evidence and gap map of intervention reviews (2007-2018) and supplementing this with publication and grey literature searches for primary research and protocol documents between 2007 and 2020. From 941 non-duplicate records identified, 63 were included for review.
Results
Most records referenced interventions taking place in low- and middle-income countries (65%). There were a wide range of intervention theories of change reported, typically targeting individual-level behaviours and sometimes comprising several behaviour change theories and strategies. The most commonly identified theories were Social Cognitive Theory, Social Learning Theory, the Theory of Planned Behaviour, and the IMB Skills Model. A minority of records explicitly detailed gender-informed elements within their theory of change.
Conclusion
The findings highlight the range of prevailing theories of change used, and the considerable variability in their reporting. Programmers and policy makers would be best served by unified reporting and testing of intervention change theories. There remains a need for consistent reporting of intervention theories of change to better understand precisely how complex interventions involving men and boys in family planning lead to behaviour change.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 126 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Reproductive Health |
| Volume | 18 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 13 Jun 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Statement: This work was funded by the Centre of Excellence for Development Impact and Learning (CEDIL), supported by UKAID from the UK Government [Grant: S.238].Keywords
- Behaviour Change
- Reproductive Health
- Family Planning
- Rapid Review
- Men and Boys
Access to Document
- Nothing so practical as theory: a rapid review of the use of behaviour change theory in family planning interventions involving men and boys
Copyright 201 the authors. This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Nothing so practical as theory: a rapid review of the use of behaviour change theory in family planning interventions involving men and boys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
R3180NUR: Involving Men and Boys in Family Planning: A systematic review to identify programme characteristics, and combinations of characteristics, that are associated with positive maternal and child health outcomes in low- and middle income countries
Aventin, Á. (PI), Clarke, M. (CoI), Hanratty, J. (CoI), Lohan, M. (CoI) & Tomlinson, M. (CoI)
11/03/2020 → 31/03/2022
Project: Research