Occupy Differently: Space, Community and Urban Counter-Conduct

Daniel Bulley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
427 Downloads (Pure)


This article demonstrates how the concept of counter-conducts helps us understand Occupy by directing attention to the correlation between the way advanced liberalism works to control urban spaces and the way that control is countered through Occupy’s tactics. The first section outlines the term counter-conducts by looking to Foucault’s short and undeveloped theorisation. The second examines how advanced liberalism conducts conduct through the use of urban space, concentrating on London which comes to form a space of and for the mobility and circulation of goods, people and ideas. Occupy’s tactics directly confront and counter such movement while engaging in its own forms of counter-circulation and (im)mobility. The third section examines how advanced liberal techniques have increasingly come to use a particular, heavily instrumentalised understanding of community in order to divide and control urban populations. Occupy’s tactics embody versions of community which confront and oppose such instrumentalisation, ultimately both engaging with that control and partially reproducing it. Through these counter-conducts we can come to a view of Occupy as inevitably succeeding in its failure as a movement and failing in its success, while opening to an (im)possible
futurity of occupying urban space differently.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)238-257
Number of pages20
JournalGlobal Society
Issue number2
Early online date18 Feb 2016
Publication statusPublished - 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'Occupy Differently: Space, Community and Urban Counter-Conduct'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this