On Extraterritoriality and the Gazprom case

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1163 Downloads (Pure)


In September 2012 the European Commission opened a formal investigation of Gazprom’s business practices in the EU. The Gazprom investigation raises a number of questions. One of them is the issue of jurisdiction—whether EU competition law applies to Gazprom, a foreign company. A day after the opening of the proceeding, in a press note and alongside other issues, Gazprom raised the question of jurisdiction, noting that it complies with laws of the countries in which it operates and that is it ‘registered outside the jurisdiction of the EU’. This statement, possibly, prompted some commentators to consider the applicability of EU law in this case.
In a piece in the ECLR, entitled ‘Iron Curtain at the border: Gazprom and the Russian blocking order to prevent the extraterritoriality of EU competition law’, Sean Morris offered his views on some of the aspects of the Gazprom case, including the issue of jurisdiction. Morris discussed also the blocking Order issued by the Russian President in response to the European Commission’s investigation, and its possible effects in the Gazprom case.
This article seeks to add a few important and relevant issues of law relating to extraterritoriality and the reach of EU law generally and in particular— in the context of the Gazprom investigation and in the light of the Morris article. This piece also sheds some light on the considerations which might have informed Russia’s hastily enactment of the Blocking Order.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)291-294
JournalEuropean Competition Law Review
Issue number7
Early online date05 Jun 2015
Publication statusPublished - 2015


  • extraterritoriality
  • extraterritorial jurisdiction
  • EU competition law
  • competition law
  • antitrust
  • Gazprom
  • effects doctrine


Dive into the research topics of 'On Extraterritoriality and the Gazprom case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this