Abstract
In a previous article in this journal, Daniel Kelly, Steven Stich, Kevin Haley, Serena Eng and Dan Fessler report data that, according to them, foster scepticism about an association between harm and morality existent in the Turiel tradition (Kelly et al., 2007). This article challenges their interpretation of the data. It does so by explicating some methodological problems in the Turiel tradition that Kelly et al. themselves in a way inherit and by drawing on new evidence coming from a partial replication of their research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 209-234 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Mind & Language |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 30 Mar 2009 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2009 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Philosophy
- Linguistics and Language