On the waterfront: neoliberal urbanism and the politics of public benefit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper responds to the empirical and conceptual challenges concerning public benefit. In an era of neoliberal urbanism the waterfront has become a focal point of planning intervention; however, this raises important political issues concerning the distributional consequences of redeveloping large tracts of derelict land and dilapidated property. The central line of inquiry concerns what benefits, for whom and where emerge on the waterfront under neoliberal urbanism? In grounding the empiricism we focus on the neoliberal planning of Belfast's waterfront through a detailed discussion of Laganside (1989–2007) and Titanic Quarter (2001–present). Despite major transformation in Belfast city centre and on the waterfront, plus the ongoing peace process, the imprints of volatile identity politics and severe social deprivation are entrenched in other areas of the city. Given this, Belfast provides a unique and instructive case to critically explore the socio-spatialities of public benefit in a neoliberalised, politicised and polarised urban landscape. More broadly our research talks to ongoing debates on the conceptual merit and practical utility of public benefit as a central organising principle for spatial planning.
LanguageEnglish
Pages117-127
Number of pages11
JournalCities
Volume61
Early online date06 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Fingerprint

public benefits
politics
land and property
social deprivation
peace process
empiricism
planning
spatial planning
city center
present
public
Planning

Cite this

@article{2d71832c24be439f89773d5296441524,
title = "On the waterfront: neoliberal urbanism and the politics of public benefit",
abstract = "This paper responds to the empirical and conceptual challenges concerning public benefit. In an era of neoliberal urbanism the waterfront has become a focal point of planning intervention; however, this raises important political issues concerning the distributional consequences of redeveloping large tracts of derelict land and dilapidated property. The central line of inquiry concerns what benefits, for whom and where emerge on the waterfront under neoliberal urbanism? In grounding the empiricism we focus on the neoliberal planning of Belfast's waterfront through a detailed discussion of Laganside (1989–2007) and Titanic Quarter (2001–present). Despite major transformation in Belfast city centre and on the waterfront, plus the ongoing peace process, the imprints of volatile identity politics and severe social deprivation are entrenched in other areas of the city. Given this, Belfast provides a unique and instructive case to critically explore the socio-spatialities of public benefit in a neoliberalised, politicised and polarised urban landscape. More broadly our research talks to ongoing debates on the conceptual merit and practical utility of public benefit as a central organising principle for spatial planning.",
author = "Philip Boland and John Bronte and Jenny Muir",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cities.2016.08.012",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "117--127",
journal = "Cities",
issn = "0264-2751",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

On the waterfront: neoliberal urbanism and the politics of public benefit. / Boland, Philip; Bronte, John; Muir, Jenny.

In: Cities, Vol. 61, 01.2017, p. 117-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the waterfront: neoliberal urbanism and the politics of public benefit

AU - Boland, Philip

AU - Bronte, John

AU - Muir, Jenny

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - This paper responds to the empirical and conceptual challenges concerning public benefit. In an era of neoliberal urbanism the waterfront has become a focal point of planning intervention; however, this raises important political issues concerning the distributional consequences of redeveloping large tracts of derelict land and dilapidated property. The central line of inquiry concerns what benefits, for whom and where emerge on the waterfront under neoliberal urbanism? In grounding the empiricism we focus on the neoliberal planning of Belfast's waterfront through a detailed discussion of Laganside (1989–2007) and Titanic Quarter (2001–present). Despite major transformation in Belfast city centre and on the waterfront, plus the ongoing peace process, the imprints of volatile identity politics and severe social deprivation are entrenched in other areas of the city. Given this, Belfast provides a unique and instructive case to critically explore the socio-spatialities of public benefit in a neoliberalised, politicised and polarised urban landscape. More broadly our research talks to ongoing debates on the conceptual merit and practical utility of public benefit as a central organising principle for spatial planning.

AB - This paper responds to the empirical and conceptual challenges concerning public benefit. In an era of neoliberal urbanism the waterfront has become a focal point of planning intervention; however, this raises important political issues concerning the distributional consequences of redeveloping large tracts of derelict land and dilapidated property. The central line of inquiry concerns what benefits, for whom and where emerge on the waterfront under neoliberal urbanism? In grounding the empiricism we focus on the neoliberal planning of Belfast's waterfront through a detailed discussion of Laganside (1989–2007) and Titanic Quarter (2001–present). Despite major transformation in Belfast city centre and on the waterfront, plus the ongoing peace process, the imprints of volatile identity politics and severe social deprivation are entrenched in other areas of the city. Given this, Belfast provides a unique and instructive case to critically explore the socio-spatialities of public benefit in a neoliberalised, politicised and polarised urban landscape. More broadly our research talks to ongoing debates on the conceptual merit and practical utility of public benefit as a central organising principle for spatial planning.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cities.2016.08.012

DO - 10.1016/j.cities.2016.08.012

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 117

EP - 127

JO - Cities

T2 - Cities

JF - Cities

SN - 0264-2751

ER -