Once versus three-times daily regimens of tobramycin treatment for pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis—the TOPIC study: a randomised controlled trial

Alan Smyth*, Kelvin H.V. Tan, Pauline Hyman-Taylor, Michael Mulheran, Sarah Lewis, David Stableforth, Alan Knox

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

189 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Intravenous tobramycin (three-times daily) is widely used for pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis who have chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. We undertook a double-blind, randomised controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of once versus three-times daily tobramycin in these patients. 

Methods: 244 patients from 21 cystic-fibrosis centres in the UK were randomly assigned to once or three-times daily tobramycin (with ceftazidime) for 14 days. Treatment was given as 30-min infusions of tobramycin in 0·9% saline. Primary outcome measure was change in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1), over the 14 days of treatment, expressed as a percentage of the predicted normal value for age, sex, and height. We also measured the change in FEV1 expressed as a percentage of baseline. Secondary outcomes included change in serum creatinine. The study was powered for equivalence, and primary analysis was per protocol. 

Findings: 219 patients (107 once daily, 112 three-times daily) completed the study per protocol. None was lost to follow-up, although 20 discontinued intervention. Of 122 patients assigned to once daily treatment, three did not receive the study regimen. The mean change in FEV1 (% predicted) over 14 days was similar on the two regimens (10·4% [once daily] vs 10·0% [three-times daily]; adjusted mean difference 0·4% [95% CI -3·3 to 4·1]). Mean% change in FEV1 from baseline was also similar in both treatments (21·9% vs 22·1%; -0·1% [-8·0 to 7·9]). There was no significant difference in% change in creatinine from baseline (-1·5% [once daily] vs 1·7% [three-times daily]). However, in children, once daily treatment was significantly less nephrotoxic than was thrice daily (mean% change in creatine -4·5% [once daily] vs 3·7% [thrice daily]; adjusted mean difference -8·0%, 95% CI -15·7 to -0·4). No patients developed hearing loss during the study, although two reported acute dizziness and were withdrawn from the study. 

Interpretation: Intravenous tobramycin has equal efficacy if given once or three-times daily (with ceftazidime) for pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis. The once daily regimen might be less nephrotoxic in children.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)573-578
Number of pages6
JournalLancet
Volume365
Issue number9459
Early online date11 Feb 2005
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Feb 2005
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was funded by the UK Cystic Fibrosis Trust grant PJ467. Additional support for microbiology work was provided by Chiron Corporation. Eclipse infusion devices were provided courtesy of Fresenius Kabi Ltd, Cheshire, UK and I-Flow Corp, Lake Forest, CA, USA. We thank John Govan and Cathy Doherty for their microbiology assistance.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Once versus three-times daily regimens of tobramycin treatment for pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis—the TOPIC study: a randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this