Our Construct or Theirs?

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    Identity is relational and a construct, and is expressed in a myriad of ways. For example, material culture and its pluralist meanings have been readily manipulated by humans in a prehistoric context in order to construct personal and group identities. Artefacts were often from or reminiscent of far-flung places and were used to demonstrate membership of an (imagined) regional, or European community. Earthworks frequently archive maximum visual impact through elaborate ramparts and entrances with the minimum amount of effort, indicating that the construction of identities were as much in the eye of the perceivor, as of the perceived. Variations in domestic architectural style also demonstrate the malleability of identity, and the prolonged, intermittent use of particular places for specific functions indicates that the identity of place is just as important in our archaeological understanding as the identity of people. By using a wide range of case studies, both temporally and spatially, these thought processes may be explored further and diachronic and geographic patterns in expressions of identity investigated.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationExploring Prehistoric Identity in Europe: Our Construct or Theirs?
    EditorsVictoria Ginn, Rebecca Enlander, Rebecca Crozier
    Place of PublicationOxford
    PublisherOxbow: Oxford
    Pages162-164
    Number of pages4
    ISBN (Print)9781842178133
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Our Construct or Theirs?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Horning, A. (2014). Our Construct or Theirs? In V. Ginn, R. Enlander, & R. Crozier (Eds.), Exploring Prehistoric Identity in Europe: Our Construct or Theirs? (pp. 162-164). Oxbow: Oxford.