Parallel, divergent or drifting? Regulating healthcare products in a post-Brexit UK

Mark Dayan*, Tamara Hervey, Nick Fahy, Elizabeth Vlachakis, Martha McCarey, Mark Flear, Scott Greer, Holly Jarman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

EU laws have exerted a powerful influence on research, manufacturing, supply, sale and procurement of the products on which national health systems rely. Pre-Brexit, the UK was closely involved in the policy and operation of regulations affecting these goods. Since Brexit, ideological polarisation and the political salience of health during a global pandemic have driven a rhetoric of competitive divergence. However, active UK policy divergence to date is limited. It is unsettled whether the UK, as a small market in this global industry, genuinely seeks a higher risk, more industry-friendly regulatory paradigm. With regulatory and policy capacity also under strain, important decisions have been delayed. The position of Northern Ireland remains highly precarious, with negotiations ongoing on how to handle its unique partial status within the single market. The UK’s attempt to remain within the EU’s research funding programme has consequently been pushed into involuntary divergence.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages33
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Early online date29 May 2023
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 29 May 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Parallel, divergent or drifting? Regulating healthcare products in a post-Brexit UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this