TY - JOUR
T1 - Parallels and discrepancies between non-native species introductions and human migration
AU - Ahmed, Danish A
AU - Sousa, Ronaldo
AU - Bortolus, Alejandro
AU - Aldemir, Ceray
AU - Angeli, Nicole F
AU - Błońska, Dagmara
AU - Briski, Elizabeta
AU - Britton, J Robert
AU - Cano-Barbacil, Carlos
AU - Clark-Ginsberg, Aaron
AU - Culic, Irina
AU - Cuthbert, Ross N.
AU - Dick, Jaimie
AU - Dimarco, Romina D
AU - Essl, Franz
AU - Everts, Teun
AU - García-Berthou, Emili
AU - Hauer, Mathew
AU - Kouba, Antonín
AU - Kourantidou, Melina
AU - Kutschera, Ulrich
AU - Mammola, Stefano
AU - Martín-Forés, Irene
AU - Morissette, Olivier
AU - Nuñez, Martin A
AU - Olden, Julian D
AU - Pârvulescu, Lucian
AU - Pergl, Jan
AU - Renault, David
AU - Rico-Sánchez, Axel Eduardo
AU - Russell, James C
AU - Soto, Ismael
AU - Serhan Tarkan, Ali
AU - Uysal, Tuğba Uçma
AU - Verreycken, Hugo
AU - Vilizzi, Lorenzo
AU - Wasserman, Ryan
AU - Wehi, Priscilla
AU - Haubrock, Phillip J
N1 - © 2025 The Author(s). Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.
PY - 2025/2/20
Y1 - 2025/2/20
N2 - Biological invasions and human migrations have increased globally due to socio-economic drivers and environmental factors that have enhanced cultural, economic, and geographic connectivity. Both processes involve the movement, establishment, and spread of species, yet unfold within fundamentally different philosophical, social and biological contexts. Hence, studying biological invasions (invasion science) and human migration (migration studies) presents complex parallels that are potentially fruitful to explore. Here, we examined nuanced parallels and differences between these two phenomena, integrating historical, socio-political, and ethical perspectives. Our review underscores the need for context-specific approaches in policymaking and governance to address effectively the challenges and opportunities of human migration and harm from biological invasions. We suggest that approaches to studying the drivers of biological invasions and human migration provide an excellent opportunity for transdisciplinary research; one that acknowledges the complexities and potential insights from both fields of study. Ultimately, integrating natural and social sciences offers a promising avenue for enriching the understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing just, equitable, and sustainable solutions. However, while human migration is a clear driver of biological invasions, drawing on principles from biological invasions to understand past and current human migration risks oversimplification and the potential for harmful generalisations that disregard the intrinsic rights and cultural dynamics of human migrations. By doing so, we provide insights and frameworks to support the development of context-specific policies that respect human dignity, foster cultural diversity, and address migration challenges in ways that promote global cooperation and justice. This interdisciplinary approach highlights the potential for transdisciplinary research that acknowledges complexities in both fields, ultimately enriching our understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing equitable and sustainable solutions.
AB - Biological invasions and human migrations have increased globally due to socio-economic drivers and environmental factors that have enhanced cultural, economic, and geographic connectivity. Both processes involve the movement, establishment, and spread of species, yet unfold within fundamentally different philosophical, social and biological contexts. Hence, studying biological invasions (invasion science) and human migration (migration studies) presents complex parallels that are potentially fruitful to explore. Here, we examined nuanced parallels and differences between these two phenomena, integrating historical, socio-political, and ethical perspectives. Our review underscores the need for context-specific approaches in policymaking and governance to address effectively the challenges and opportunities of human migration and harm from biological invasions. We suggest that approaches to studying the drivers of biological invasions and human migration provide an excellent opportunity for transdisciplinary research; one that acknowledges the complexities and potential insights from both fields of study. Ultimately, integrating natural and social sciences offers a promising avenue for enriching the understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing just, equitable, and sustainable solutions. However, while human migration is a clear driver of biological invasions, drawing on principles from biological invasions to understand past and current human migration risks oversimplification and the potential for harmful generalisations that disregard the intrinsic rights and cultural dynamics of human migrations. By doing so, we provide insights and frameworks to support the development of context-specific policies that respect human dignity, foster cultural diversity, and address migration challenges in ways that promote global cooperation and justice. This interdisciplinary approach highlights the potential for transdisciplinary research that acknowledges complexities in both fields, ultimately enriching our understanding of invasion biology and migration dynamics while pursuing equitable and sustainable solutions.
KW - non-native species
KW - non-native species introductions
KW - human migration
U2 - 10.1111/brv.70004
DO - 10.1111/brv.70004
M3 - Article
C2 - 39980263
SN - 1464-7931
JO - Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
JF - Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
ER -