Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews

Mike Clarke

doi:10.1186/s13643-018-0833-3

Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews

Mike Clarke

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

140 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Six years after the launch of Systematic Reviews by Biomed Central, this article is part of the celebration of the journal. It contains personal reflections on the past, present and future of systematic reviews, using examples relevant to the role of systematic reviews in cataloguing and analysing research, assessing quality and planning new studies. The focus is on the most common of the various types of systematic review in health and social care, namely those assessing the effects of interventions.

Original language	English
Article number	176
Number of pages	6
Journal	Systematic Reviews
Volume	7
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0833-3
Publication status	Published - 27 Oct 2018

Access to Document

10.1186/s13643-018-0833-3Licence: CC BY

Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews
© 2018 The Author(s). Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Final published version, 578 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{bbe16623606c4978ae4dc986ffd292df,

title = "Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews",

abstract = "Six years after the launch of Systematic Reviews by Biomed Central, this article is part of the celebration of the journal. It contains personal reflections on the past, present and future of systematic reviews, using examples relevant to the role of systematic reviews in cataloguing and analysing research, assessing quality and planning new studies. The focus is on the most common of the various types of systematic review in health and social care, namely those assessing the effects of interventions.",

author = "Mike Clarke",

year = "2018",

month = oct,

day = "27",

doi = "10.1186/s13643-018-0833-3",

language = "English",

volume = "7",

journal = "Systematic Reviews",

issn = "2046-4053",

publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews

AU - Clarke, Mike

PY - 2018/10/27

Y1 - 2018/10/27

N2 - Six years after the launch of Systematic Reviews by Biomed Central, this article is part of the celebration of the journal. It contains personal reflections on the past, present and future of systematic reviews, using examples relevant to the role of systematic reviews in cataloguing and analysing research, assessing quality and planning new studies. The focus is on the most common of the various types of systematic review in health and social care, namely those assessing the effects of interventions.

AB - Six years after the launch of Systematic Reviews by Biomed Central, this article is part of the celebration of the journal. It contains personal reflections on the past, present and future of systematic reviews, using examples relevant to the role of systematic reviews in cataloguing and analysing research, assessing quality and planning new studies. The focus is on the most common of the various types of systematic review in health and social care, namely those assessing the effects of interventions.

U2 - 10.1186/s13643-018-0833-3

DO - 10.1186/s13643-018-0833-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 30368251

SN - 2046-4053

VL - 7

JO - Systematic Reviews

JF - Systematic Reviews

IS - 1

M1 - 176

ER -

Partially systematic thoughts on the history of systematic reviews

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this