Pedometer-driven walking for chronic low back pain A feasibility randomized controlled trial

Suzanne M. McDonough, Mark A. Tully, Adele Boyd, Sean O'Connor, Daniel P. Kerr, Siobhan M. O'Neill, Anthony Delitto, Ian Bradbury, Catrine Tudor-Locke, George David Baxter, Dierdre A. Hurley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the feasibility of an RCT of a pedometer-driven walking program and education/advice to remain active compared with education/advice only for treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP).

METHODS
Fifty-seven participants with CLBP recruited from primary care were randomly allocated to either: (1) education/advice (E, n=17) or (2) education/advice plus an 8-week pedometer-driven walking program (EWP, n=40). Step targets, actual daily step counts, and adverse events were recorded in a walking diary over the 8 weeks of intervention for the EWP group only. All other outcomes (eg, functional disability using the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ), pain scores, physical activity (PA) measurement etc.) were recorded at baseline, week 9 (immediately post-intervention), and 6 months in both groups.

RESULTS
The recruitment rate was 22% and the dropout rate was lower than anticipated (13% to 18% at 6 mo). Adherence with the EWP was high, 93% (n=37/40) walked for =6 weeks, and increased their steps/day [mean absolute increase in steps/d, 2776, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1996-3557] by 59% (95% CI, 40.73%-76.25%) from baseline. Mean percentage adherence with weekly step targets was 70% (95% CI, 62%-77%). Eight (20%) minor-related adverse events were observed in 13% (5/40) of the participants. The EWP group participants demonstrated an 8.2% point improvement [95% CI, -13 to -3.4] on the ODQ at 6 months compared with 1.6% points [95% CI, -9.3 to 6.1) for the E group (between group d=0.44). There was also a larger mean improvement in pain (d=0.4) and a larger increase in PA (d=0.59) at 6 months in EWP. DISCUSSION: This preliminary study demonstrated that a main RCT is feasible. EWP was safe and produced a real increase in walking; CLBP function and pain improved, and participants perceived a greater improvement in their PA levels. These improvements require confirmation in a fully powered RCT.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)972-981
JournalThe Clinical journal of pain
Volume29
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Bibliographical note

Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Pedometer-driven walking for chronic low back pain A feasibility randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    McDonough, S. M., Tully, M. A., Boyd, A., O'Connor, S., Kerr, D. P., O'Neill, S. M., Delitto, A., Bradbury, I., Tudor-Locke, C., Baxter, G. D., & Hurley, D. A. (2013). Pedometer-driven walking for chronic low back pain A feasibility randomized controlled trial. The Clinical journal of pain, 29(11), 972-981. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e31827f9d81