Abstract

This paper examines peer effects in adolescent cannabis use from several different reference groups, exploiting survey data that have many desirable properties and have not previously been used for this purpose. Treating the school grade as the reference group, and using both neighbourhood fixed effects and IV for identification, we find evidence of large, positive, and statistically significant peer effects. Treating nominated friends as the reference group, and using both school fixed effects and IV for identification, we again find evidence of large, positive, and generally statistically significant peer effects. Our preferred IV approach exploits information about friends of friends – ‘friends once removed’, who are not themselves friends – to instrument for friends’ cannabis use. Finally, we examine whether the cannabis use of schoolmates who are not nominated as friends – ‘non-friends’ – influences
own cannabis use. Once again using neighbourhood fixed effects and IV for identification, the evidence suggests zero impact. In our data, schoolmates who are not also friends have no influence on adolescent cannabis use.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Publication series

NameMelbourne Institute Working Paper Series
PublisherMelbourne Institute for Applied Economic and Social Research
No.12
Volume27
ISSN (Print)1328-4991
ISSN (Electronic)1447-5863

Fingerprint

adolescent
reference group
evidence
school grade
school

Cite this

Moriarty, J., McVicar, D., & Higgins, K. (2012). Peer Effects in Adolescent Cannabis Use: It's the Friends, Stupid. (Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series; Vol. 27, No. 12).
@techreport{f02567565b9540f28288d0e527de0deb,
title = "Peer Effects in Adolescent Cannabis Use: It's the Friends, Stupid",
abstract = "This paper examines peer effects in adolescent cannabis use from several different reference groups, exploiting survey data that have many desirable properties and have not previously been used for this purpose. Treating the school grade as the reference group, and using both neighbourhood fixed effects and IV for identification, we find evidence of large, positive, and statistically significant peer effects. Treating nominated friends as the reference group, and using both school fixed effects and IV for identification, we again find evidence of large, positive, and generally statistically significant peer effects. Our preferred IV approach exploits information about friends of friends – ‘friends once removed’, who are not themselves friends – to instrument for friends’ cannabis use. Finally, we examine whether the cannabis use of schoolmates who are not nominated as friends – ‘non-friends’ – influencesown cannabis use. Once again using neighbourhood fixed effects and IV for identification, the evidence suggests zero impact. In our data, schoolmates who are not also friends have no influence on adolescent cannabis use.",
author = "John Moriarty and Duncan McVicar and Kathryn Higgins",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
series = "Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series",
publisher = "Melbourne Institute for Applied Economic and Social Research",
number = "12",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Melbourne Institute for Applied Economic and Social Research",

}

Peer Effects in Adolescent Cannabis Use: It's the Friends, Stupid. / Moriarty, John; McVicar, Duncan; Higgins, Kathryn.

2012. (Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series; Vol. 27, No. 12).

Research output: Working paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Peer Effects in Adolescent Cannabis Use: It's the Friends, Stupid

AU - Moriarty, John

AU - McVicar, Duncan

AU - Higgins, Kathryn

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This paper examines peer effects in adolescent cannabis use from several different reference groups, exploiting survey data that have many desirable properties and have not previously been used for this purpose. Treating the school grade as the reference group, and using both neighbourhood fixed effects and IV for identification, we find evidence of large, positive, and statistically significant peer effects. Treating nominated friends as the reference group, and using both school fixed effects and IV for identification, we again find evidence of large, positive, and generally statistically significant peer effects. Our preferred IV approach exploits information about friends of friends – ‘friends once removed’, who are not themselves friends – to instrument for friends’ cannabis use. Finally, we examine whether the cannabis use of schoolmates who are not nominated as friends – ‘non-friends’ – influencesown cannabis use. Once again using neighbourhood fixed effects and IV for identification, the evidence suggests zero impact. In our data, schoolmates who are not also friends have no influence on adolescent cannabis use.

AB - This paper examines peer effects in adolescent cannabis use from several different reference groups, exploiting survey data that have many desirable properties and have not previously been used for this purpose. Treating the school grade as the reference group, and using both neighbourhood fixed effects and IV for identification, we find evidence of large, positive, and statistically significant peer effects. Treating nominated friends as the reference group, and using both school fixed effects and IV for identification, we again find evidence of large, positive, and generally statistically significant peer effects. Our preferred IV approach exploits information about friends of friends – ‘friends once removed’, who are not themselves friends – to instrument for friends’ cannabis use. Finally, we examine whether the cannabis use of schoolmates who are not nominated as friends – ‘non-friends’ – influencesown cannabis use. Once again using neighbourhood fixed effects and IV for identification, the evidence suggests zero impact. In our data, schoolmates who are not also friends have no influence on adolescent cannabis use.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series

BT - Peer Effects in Adolescent Cannabis Use: It's the Friends, Stupid

ER -