Performance and Information Leakage in Splitfed Learning and Multi-Head Split Learning in Healthcare Data and Beyond

Praveen Joshi*, Chandra Thapa, Seyit Camtepe, Mohammed Hasanuzzaman, Ted Scully, Haithem Afli

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) in healthcare data analytics is attracting much attention because of the unprecedented power of ML to extract knowledge that improves the decision-making process. At the same time, laws and ethics codes drafted by countries to govern healthcare data are becoming stringent. Although healthcare practitioners are struggling with an enforced governance framework, we see the emergence of distributed learning-based frameworks disrupting traditional-ML-model development. Splitfed learning (SFL) is one of the recent developments in distributed machine learning that empowers healthcare practitioners to preserve the privacy of input data and enables them to train ML models. However, SFL has some extra communication and computation overheads at the client side due to the requirement of client-side model synchronization. For a resource-constrained client side (hospitals with limited computational powers), removing such conditions is required to gain efficiency in the learning. In this regard, this paper studies SFL without client-side model synchronization. The resulting architecture is known as multi-head split learning (MHSL). At the same time, it is important to investigate information leakage, which indicates how much information is gained by the server related to the raw data directly out of the smashed data—the output of the client-side model portion—passed to it by the client. Our empirical studies examine the Resnet-18 and Conv1-D architecture model on the ECG and HAM-10000 datasets under IID data distribution. The results find that SFL provides 1.81% and 2.36% better accuracy than MHSL on the ECG and HAM-10000 datasets, respectively (for cut-layer value set to 1). Analysis of experimentation with various client-side model portions demonstrates that it has an impact on the overall performance. With an increase in layers in the client-side model portion, SFL performance improves while MHSL performance degrades. Experiment results also demonstrate that information leakage provided by mutual information score values in SFL is more than MHSL for ECG and HAM-10000 datasets by (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.), respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Article number60
Number of pages15
JournalMethods and Protocols
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jul 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was conducted with the financial support of the ADVANCE CRT Ph.D. program within the ADAPT SFI Research Centre at Munster Technological University. The ADAPT SFI Centre for Digital Media Technology is funded by Science Foundation Ireland through the SFI Research Centres Programme and is co-funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through Grant 13/RC/2106. The project was partially supported by the Horizon 2020 projects STOP Obesity Platform under Grant Agreement No. 823978 and ITFLOWS under Grant Agreement No. 882986.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.

Keywords

  • distributed collaborative machine learning
  • information leakage in distributed learning
  • multi-head split learning
  • parameter transmission-based distributed machine learning
  • privacy-preserving machine learning
  • split learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Structural Biology
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance and Information Leakage in Splitfed Learning and Multi-Head Split Learning in Healthcare Data and Beyond'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this