Abstract
Current regulatory programs for drug safety are not designed to identify adverse events that have a long induction time or are rare, such as most cancers. Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials of medications can sometimes provide information on shorter-term risk of common cancer types, though large observational studies with long follow-up are needed to examine most drug–cancer associations. Over the last few decades, a number of new methods have been developed to address several types of confounding and bias of particular concern in pharmacoepidemiology, and better data sources have become available. Of the approximately twenty medications with sufficient evidence to be classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as human carcinogens, most are anti-neoplastic agents or immunosuppressants. Substantial data from studies in humans indicate that use of aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) protects against colorectal cancer and possibly a number of other common cancers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Schottenfeld and Fraumeni cancer epidemiology and prevention |
Editors | Michael J. Thun, Martha S. Linet , James R. Cerhan , Christopher A. Haiman, David Schottenfeld |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Chapter | 23 |
Pages | 411-432 |
Number of pages | 22 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780190238667 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 01 Jan 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Oxford University Press 2018.
Keywords
- Drug safety
- Drug-cancer associations
- Human carcinogens
- International agency for research on cancer
- Pharmacoepidemiology
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine