Philip Morris v. Uruguay: A Breathing Space for Domestic IP Regulation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Examines the ICSID decision in Philip Morris Brands SARL v Uruguay on whether legislation limiting tobacco companies to one presentation of their packaging for each family brand of product, and increasing the size of health warnings on cigarette packaging to 80 per cent, amounted to expropriation and a violation of the fair and equitable treatment standard or fell within the scope of the state's sovereign right to regulate public health matters.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-284
JournalEuropean Intellectual Property Review
Volume40
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 01 Apr 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Philip Morris v. Uruguay: A Breathing Space for Domestic IP Regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this