Potential quality pitfalls of digitalized whole slide image of breast pathology in routine practice

Nehal M Atallah, Michael S Toss, Clare Verrill, Manuel Salto-Tellez, David Snead, Emad A Rakha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
82 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Using digitalized whole slide images (WSI) in routine histopathology practice is a revolutionary technology. This study aims to assess the clinical impacts of WSI quality and representation of the corresponding glass slides. 40,160 breast WSIs were examined and compared with their corresponding glass slides. The presence, frequency, location, tissue type, and the clinical impacts of missing tissue were assessed. Scanning time, type of the specimens, time to WSIs implementation, and quality control (QC) measures were also considered. The frequency of missing tissue ranged from 2% to 19%. The area size of the missed tissue ranged from 1–70%. In most cases (>75%), the missing tissue area size was <10% and peripherally located. In all cases the missed tissue was fat with or without small entrapped normal breast parenchyma. No missing tissue was identified in WSIs of the core biopsy specimens. QC measures improved images quality and reduced WSI failure rates by seven-fold. A negative linear correlation between the frequency of missing tissue and both the scanning time and the image file size was observed (p < 0.05). None of the WSI with missing tissues resulted in a change in the final diagnosis. Missing tissue on breast WSI is observed but with variable frequency and little diagnostic consequence. Balancing between WSI quality and scanning time/image file size should be considered and pathology laboratories should undertake their own assessments of risk and provide the relevant mitigations with the appropriate level of caution.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages8
JournalModern Pathology
Early online date27 Dec 2021
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 27 Dec 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Potential quality pitfalls of digitalized whole slide image of breast pathology in routine practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this