Abstract
Using digitalized whole slide images (WSI) in routine histopathology practice is a revolutionary technology. This study aims to
assess the clinical impacts of WSI quality and representation of the corresponding glass slides. 40,160 breast WSIs were examined
and compared with their corresponding glass slides. The presence, frequency, location, tissue type, and the clinical impacts of
missing tissue were assessed. Scanning time, type of the specimens, time to WSIs implementation, and quality control (QC)
measures were also considered. The frequency of missing tissue ranged from 2% to 19%. The area size of the missed tissue ranged
from 1–70%. In most cases (>75%), the missing tissue area size was <10% and peripherally located. In all cases the missed tissue
was fat with or without small entrapped normal breast parenchyma. No missing tissue was identified in WSIs of the core biopsy
specimens. QC measures improved images quality and reduced WSI failure rates by seven-fold. A negative linear correlation
between the frequency of missing tissue and both the scanning time and the image file size was observed (p < 0.05). None of the
WSI with missing tissues resulted in a change in the final diagnosis. Missing tissue on breast WSI is observed but with variable
frequency and little diagnostic consequence. Balancing between WSI quality and scanning time/image file size should be
considered and pathology laboratories should undertake their own assessments of risk and provide the relevant mitigations with
the appropriate level of caution.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Modern Pathology |
Early online date | 27 Dec 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Early online date - 27 Dec 2021 |