Prey and predator density-dependent interactions under different water volumes

Ross N. Cuthbert*, Tatenda Dalu, Ryan J. Wasserman, Arnaud Sentis, Olaf L.F. Weyl, P. William Froneman, Amanda Callaghan, Jaimie T.A. Dick

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Downloads (Pure)


Predation is a critical ecological process that directly and indirectly mediates population stabilities, as well as ecosystem structure and function. The strength of interactions between predators and prey may be mediated by multiple density dependences concerning numbers of predators and prey. In temporary wetland ecosystems in particular, fluctuating water volumes may alter predation rates through differing search space and prey encounter rates. Using a functional response approach, we examined the influence of predator and prey densities on interaction strengths of the temporary pond specialist copepod Lovenula raynerae preying on cladoceran prey, Daphnia pulex, under contrasting water volumes. Further, using a population dynamic modeling approach, we quantified multiple predator effects across differences in prey density and water volume. Predators exhibited type II functional responses under both water volumes, with significant antagonistic multiple predator effects (i.e., antagonisms) exhibited overall. The strengths of antagonistic interactions were, however, enhanced under reduced water volumes and at intermediate prey densities. These findings indicate important biotic and abiotic contexts that mediate predator–prey dynamics, whereby multiple predator effects are contingent on both prey density and search area characteristics. In particular, reduced search areas (i.e., water volumes) under intermediate prey densities could enhance antagonisms by heightening predator–predator interference effects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6504-6512
Number of pages9
JournalEcology and Evolution
Issue number11
Early online date30 Mar 2021
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This article is dedicated to Prof. Olaf L.F. Weyl, who passed away suddenly on the 14 November 2020. He provided immense support for work on ephemeral wetlands in Southern Africa, and other freshwaters. RNC is funded through a Postdoctoral Research Fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. TD acknowledges funding from the National Research Foundation (Grant No. 117700). This study received funding from the Department for the Economy, Northern Ireland. We thank Rhodes University for the provision of laboratory facilities. We acknowledge the use of infrastructure and equipment provided by the South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB) Research Platform and the funding channeled through the National Research Foundation—SAIAB Institutional Support system. This study was partly funded by the National Research Foundation—South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Innovation (Inland Fisheries and Freshwater Ecology, Grant No. 110507).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.


  • antagonism
  • consumer–resource
  • functional response
  • multiple predator effects
  • temporary pond
  • zooplankton

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation


Dive into the research topics of 'Prey and predator density-dependent interactions under different water volumes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this