PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY OF AMATEURS: THE CONTEXT OF SPORTS COACHING

Neil Partington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The developing intersection between the law of negligence and sports coaching in the UK provides a profoundly distinctive context, as compared to that of the more traditional learned professions, in which to critically examine the issue of professional liability. More specifically, detailed consideration of the Bolam test in the context of sports coaching, where the majority of coaches are volunteers, reinforces the Bolam doctrine as a control mechanism designed to protect both claimants and defendants alike. Importantly, a fuller analysis of related jurisprudence, even in instances where defendant coaches lack a formal qualification, and/or may not have engaged in considered and reasoned decision-making, reveals the potential for the Bolam test to operate as a quasi-defence, thereby safeguarding coaches from negligence liability. Nonetheless, in discharging this heightened standard of care incumbent upon them, coaches must ensure that the coaching practices adopted are regular, approved, and capable of withstanding robust and logical scrutiny. Ultimately, this article’s analysis of the principles of professional liability, in the specific circumstances of sports coaching, should prove to be of appreciably wider interest and utility for practitioners specialising in personal injury law.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)232-242
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Personal Injury Law
Volume4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Fingerprint

amateur
coaching
coach
liability
Sports
Law
jurisprudence
qualification
doctrine
profession
decision making
lack

Keywords

  • Bolam Test
  • Coaches
  • Personal Injury
  • Professional Negligence
  • Sports
  • Volunteers

Cite this

@article{51b210f4f7ca416b8d222ce1e4529303,
title = "PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY OF AMATEURS: THE CONTEXT OF SPORTS COACHING",
abstract = "The developing intersection between the law of negligence and sports coaching in the UK provides a profoundly distinctive context, as compared to that of the more traditional learned professions, in which to critically examine the issue of professional liability. More specifically, detailed consideration of the Bolam test in the context of sports coaching, where the majority of coaches are volunteers, reinforces the Bolam doctrine as a control mechanism designed to protect both claimants and defendants alike. Importantly, a fuller analysis of related jurisprudence, even in instances where defendant coaches lack a formal qualification, and/or may not have engaged in considered and reasoned decision-making, reveals the potential for the Bolam test to operate as a quasi-defence, thereby safeguarding coaches from negligence liability. Nonetheless, in discharging this heightened standard of care incumbent upon them, coaches must ensure that the coaching practices adopted are regular, approved, and capable of withstanding robust and logical scrutiny. Ultimately, this article’s analysis of the principles of professional liability, in the specific circumstances of sports coaching, should prove to be of appreciably wider interest and utility for practitioners specialising in personal injury law.",
keywords = "Bolam Test, Coaches, Personal Injury, Professional Negligence, Sports, Volunteers",
author = "Neil Partington",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "232--242",
journal = "Journal of Personal Injury Law",
issn = "1352-7533",

}

PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY OF AMATEURS: THE CONTEXT OF SPORTS COACHING. / Partington, Neil.

In: Journal of Personal Injury Law, Vol. 4, 12.2015, p. 232-242.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY OF AMATEURS: THE CONTEXT OF SPORTS COACHING

AU - Partington, Neil

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - The developing intersection between the law of negligence and sports coaching in the UK provides a profoundly distinctive context, as compared to that of the more traditional learned professions, in which to critically examine the issue of professional liability. More specifically, detailed consideration of the Bolam test in the context of sports coaching, where the majority of coaches are volunteers, reinforces the Bolam doctrine as a control mechanism designed to protect both claimants and defendants alike. Importantly, a fuller analysis of related jurisprudence, even in instances where defendant coaches lack a formal qualification, and/or may not have engaged in considered and reasoned decision-making, reveals the potential for the Bolam test to operate as a quasi-defence, thereby safeguarding coaches from negligence liability. Nonetheless, in discharging this heightened standard of care incumbent upon them, coaches must ensure that the coaching practices adopted are regular, approved, and capable of withstanding robust and logical scrutiny. Ultimately, this article’s analysis of the principles of professional liability, in the specific circumstances of sports coaching, should prove to be of appreciably wider interest and utility for practitioners specialising in personal injury law.

AB - The developing intersection between the law of negligence and sports coaching in the UK provides a profoundly distinctive context, as compared to that of the more traditional learned professions, in which to critically examine the issue of professional liability. More specifically, detailed consideration of the Bolam test in the context of sports coaching, where the majority of coaches are volunteers, reinforces the Bolam doctrine as a control mechanism designed to protect both claimants and defendants alike. Importantly, a fuller analysis of related jurisprudence, even in instances where defendant coaches lack a formal qualification, and/or may not have engaged in considered and reasoned decision-making, reveals the potential for the Bolam test to operate as a quasi-defence, thereby safeguarding coaches from negligence liability. Nonetheless, in discharging this heightened standard of care incumbent upon them, coaches must ensure that the coaching practices adopted are regular, approved, and capable of withstanding robust and logical scrutiny. Ultimately, this article’s analysis of the principles of professional liability, in the specific circumstances of sports coaching, should prove to be of appreciably wider interest and utility for practitioners specialising in personal injury law.

KW - Bolam Test

KW - Coaches

KW - Personal Injury

KW - Professional Negligence

KW - Sports

KW - Volunteers

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 232

EP - 242

JO - Journal of Personal Injury Law

JF - Journal of Personal Injury Law

SN - 1352-7533

ER -