Abstract
Strut-, or Truss-Braced Wing configurations, compatible with traditional or more novel propulsion technology, have been proposed to meet future sustainable aviation goals. However, an understanding of how propulsion system performance and/or design is impacted by such novel architectural changes is required to develop an optimal integrated propulsion system solution. With a focus on the structural characteristics of the propulsion system, this paper details how major architectural parameters (mass, stiffness and location of powerplant and airframe integration) impact the key structural response of the propulsion system.
Coupled aerodynamic (DLM) – Flight Dynamics (FD) – Structural Dynamics (SD) whole aircraft models have been created for conventionally powered (TBW) and hybrid electric (TBWe) Truss-Braced Wing configurations. Models facilitate evaluation of key structural responses, of both airframe and powerplant, under a range of static and dynamic load cases.
Sensitivity analysis concluded that Truss-braced Wing configurations were more sensitive to variation in powerplant spanwise location than a conventional Tube-and-Wing aircraft. Increased coupling between powerplant swing and wing bending modes is evident, influencing dynamic response under gust loading. Moreover, differences in the mass and stiffness characteristics of the conventional and electric propulsion system features has also yielded contrasting dominant parameter sensitivities – TBW is more sensitive to variation in powerplant mass, while TBWe is more sensitive to variation in pylon stiffness.
Coupled aerodynamic (DLM) – Flight Dynamics (FD) – Structural Dynamics (SD) whole aircraft models have been created for conventionally powered (TBW) and hybrid electric (TBWe) Truss-Braced Wing configurations. Models facilitate evaluation of key structural responses, of both airframe and powerplant, under a range of static and dynamic load cases.
Sensitivity analysis concluded that Truss-braced Wing configurations were more sensitive to variation in powerplant spanwise location than a conventional Tube-and-Wing aircraft. Increased coupling between powerplant swing and wing bending modes is evident, influencing dynamic response under gust loading. Moreover, differences in the mass and stiffness characteristics of the conventional and electric propulsion system features has also yielded contrasting dominant parameter sensitivities – TBW is more sensitive to variation in powerplant mass, while TBWe is more sensitive to variation in pylon stiffness.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 109987 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Aerospace Science and Technology |
Volume | 159 |
Early online date | 31 Jan 2025 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2025 |
Keywords
- propulsion system integration
- truss-braced aircraft
- structural performance
- architectural design parameters