TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospective analysis of circulating metabolites and breast cancer in EPIC
AU - His, Mathilde
AU - Viallon, Vivian
AU - Dossus, Laure
AU - Gicquiau, Audrey
AU - Achaintre, David
AU - Scalbert, Augustin
AU - Ferrari, Pietro
AU - Romieu, Isabelle
AU - Onland-Moret, N Charlotte
AU - Weiderpass, Elisabete
AU - Dahm, Christina C
AU - Overvad, Kim
AU - Olsen, Anja
AU - Tjønneland, Anne
AU - Fournier, Agnès
AU - Rothwell, Joseph A
AU - Severi, Gianluca
AU - Kühn, Tilman
AU - Fortner, Renée T
AU - Boeing, Heiner
AU - Trichopoulou, Antonia
AU - Karakatsani, Anna
AU - Martimianaki, Georgia
AU - Masala, Giovanna
AU - Sieri, Sabina
AU - Tumino, Rosario
AU - Vineis, Paolo
AU - Panico, Salvatore
AU - van Gils, Carla H
AU - Nøst, Therese H
AU - Sandanger, Torkjel M
AU - Skeie, Guri
AU - Quirós, J Ramón
AU - Agudo, Antonio
AU - Sánchez, Maria-Jose
AU - Amiano, Pilar
AU - Huerta, José María
AU - Ardanaz, Eva
AU - Schmidt, Julie A
AU - Travis, Ruth C
AU - Riboli, Elio
AU - Tsilidis, Konstantinos K
AU - Christakoudi, Sofia
AU - Gunter, Marc J
AU - Rinaldi, Sabina
PY - 2019/9/24
Y1 - 2019/9/24
N2 - BACKGROUND: Metabolomics is a promising molecular tool to identify novel etiologic pathways leading to cancer. Using a targeted approach, we prospectively investigated the associations between metabolite concentrations in plasma and breast cancer risk.METHODS: A nested case-control study was established within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer cohort, which included 1624 first primary incident invasive breast cancer cases (with known estrogen and progesterone receptor and HER2 status) and 1624 matched controls. Metabolites (n = 127, acylcarnitines, amino acids, biogenic amines, glycerophospholipids, hexose, sphingolipids) were measured by mass spectrometry in pre-diagnostic plasma samples and tested for associations with breast cancer incidence using multivariable conditional logistic regression.RESULTS: Among women not using hormones at baseline (n = 2248), and after control for multiple tests, concentrations of arginine (odds ratio [OR] per SD = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-0.90), asparagine (OR = 0.83 (0.74-0.92)), and phosphatidylcholines (PCs) ae C36:3 (OR = 0.83 (0.76-0.90)), aa C36:3 (OR = 0.84 (0.77-0.93)), ae C34:2 (OR = 0.85 (0.78-0.94)), ae C36:2 (OR = 0.85 (0.78-0.88)), and ae C38:2 (OR = 0.84 (0.76-0.93)) were inversely associated with breast cancer risk, while the acylcarnitine C2 (OR = 1.23 (1.11-1.35)) was positively associated with disease risk. In the overall population, C2 (OR = 1.15 (1.06-1.24)) and PC ae C36:3 (OR = 0.88 (0.82-0.95)) were associated with risk of breast cancer, and these relationships did not differ by breast cancer subtype, age at diagnosis, fasting status, menopausal status, or adiposity.CONCLUSIONS: These findings point to potentially novel pathways and biomarkers of breast cancer development. Results warrant replication in other epidemiological studies.
AB - BACKGROUND: Metabolomics is a promising molecular tool to identify novel etiologic pathways leading to cancer. Using a targeted approach, we prospectively investigated the associations between metabolite concentrations in plasma and breast cancer risk.METHODS: A nested case-control study was established within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer cohort, which included 1624 first primary incident invasive breast cancer cases (with known estrogen and progesterone receptor and HER2 status) and 1624 matched controls. Metabolites (n = 127, acylcarnitines, amino acids, biogenic amines, glycerophospholipids, hexose, sphingolipids) were measured by mass spectrometry in pre-diagnostic plasma samples and tested for associations with breast cancer incidence using multivariable conditional logistic regression.RESULTS: Among women not using hormones at baseline (n = 2248), and after control for multiple tests, concentrations of arginine (odds ratio [OR] per SD = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-0.90), asparagine (OR = 0.83 (0.74-0.92)), and phosphatidylcholines (PCs) ae C36:3 (OR = 0.83 (0.76-0.90)), aa C36:3 (OR = 0.84 (0.77-0.93)), ae C34:2 (OR = 0.85 (0.78-0.94)), ae C36:2 (OR = 0.85 (0.78-0.88)), and ae C38:2 (OR = 0.84 (0.76-0.93)) were inversely associated with breast cancer risk, while the acylcarnitine C2 (OR = 1.23 (1.11-1.35)) was positively associated with disease risk. In the overall population, C2 (OR = 1.15 (1.06-1.24)) and PC ae C36:3 (OR = 0.88 (0.82-0.95)) were associated with risk of breast cancer, and these relationships did not differ by breast cancer subtype, age at diagnosis, fasting status, menopausal status, or adiposity.CONCLUSIONS: These findings point to potentially novel pathways and biomarkers of breast cancer development. Results warrant replication in other epidemiological studies.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Biomarkers/analysis
KW - Breast Neoplasms/blood
KW - Case-Control Studies
KW - Cohort Studies
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Incidence
KW - Mass Spectrometry
KW - Metabolomics/methods
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Risk Factors
U2 - 10.1186/s12916-019-1408-4
DO - 10.1186/s12916-019-1408-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 31547832
SN - 1741-7015
VL - 17
JO - BMC Medicine
JF - BMC Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 178
ER -