Protein intake and cancer: an umbrella review of systematic reviews for the evidence-based guideline of the German Nutrition Society

Tilman Kühn, Nicole Kalotai, Anna M Amini, Julia Haardt, Andreas Lehmann, Annemarie Schmidt, Anette E Buyken, Sarah Egert, Sabine Ellinger, Anja Kroke, Stefan Lorkowski, Sandrine Louis, Matthias B Schulze, Lukas Schwingshackl, Roswitha Siener, Gabriele I Stangl, Bernhard Watzl, Armin Zittermann, Katharina Nimptsch, German Nutrition Society

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: It has been proposed that a higher habitual protein intake may increase cancer risk, possibly via upregulated insulin-like growth factor signalling. Since a systematic evaluation of human studies on protein intake and cancer risk based on a standardised assessment of systematic reviews (SRs) is lacking, we carried out an umbrella review of SRs on protein intake in relation to risks of different types of cancer.

METHODS: Following a pre-specified protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42018082395), we retrieved SRs on protein intake and cancer risk published before January 22th 2024, and assessed the methodological quality and outcome-specific certainty of the evidence using a modified version of AMSTAR 2 and NutriGrade, respectively. The overall certainty of evidence was rated according to predefined criteria.

RESULTS: Ten SRs were identified, of which eight included meta-analyses. Higher total protein intake was not associated with risks of breast, prostate, colorectal, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer incidence. The methodological quality of the included SRs ranged from critically low (kidney cancer), low (pancreatic, ovarian and prostate cancer) and moderate (breast and prostate cancer) to high (colorectal cancer). The outcome-specific certainty of the evidence underlying the reported findings on protein intake and cancer risk ranged from very low (pancreatic, ovarian and prostate cancer) to low (colorectal, ovarian, prostate, and breast cancer). Animal and plant protein intakes were not associated with cancer risks either at a low (breast and prostate cancer) or very low (pancreatic and prostate cancer) outcome-specific certainty of the evidence. Overall, the evidence for the lack of an association between protein intake and (i) colorectal cancer risk and (ii) breast cancer risk was rated as possible. By contrast, the evidence underlying the other reported results was rated as insufficient.

CONCLUSION: The present findings suggest that higher total protein intake may not be associated with the risk of colorectal and breast cancer, while conclusions on protein intake in relation to risks of other types of cancer are restricted due to insufficient evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1471-1486
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Journal of Nutrition
Volume63
Issue number5
Early online date21 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2024

Bibliographical note

© 2024. The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Evidence-based guideline
  • Protein
  • Umbrella review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Protein intake and cancer: an umbrella review of systematic reviews for the evidence-based guideline of the German Nutrition Society'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this