Protocol for the development of a core outcome set and reporting guidelines for locoregional treatment in neoadjuvant systemic breast cancer treatment trials: the PRECEDENT project

Shelley Potter, Kerry Avery, Rosina Ahmed, Jana de Boniface, Sanjoy Chatterjee, David Dodwell, Peter Dubsky, Hiroji Iwata, Michael Jiang, Han-Byoel Lee, Mairead MacKenzie, Fiorita Poulakaki, Andrea L Richardson, Karla Sepulveda, Andrew Spillane, Alastair M Thompson, Gustavo Werutsky, Jean L Wright, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Katherine CowanStuart McIntosh*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction Neoadjuvant systemic anticancer therapy (neoSACT) is increasingly used in the treatment of early breast cancer. Response to therapy is prognostic and allows locoregional and adjuvant systemic treatments to be tailored to minimise morbidity and optimise oncological outcomes and quality of life. Accurate information about locoregional treatments following neoSACT is vital to allow the translation of downstaging benefits into practice and facilitate meaningful interpretation of oncological outcomes, particularly locoregional recurrence. Reporting of locoregional treatments in neoSACT studies, however, is currently poor. The development of a core outcome set (COS) and reporting guidelines is one strategy by which this may be improved.

Methods and analysis A COS for reporting locoregional treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) in neoSACT trials will be developed in accordance with Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) and Core Outcome Set-Standards for Development guidelines. Reporting guidance will be developed concurrently. The project will have three phases: (1) generation of a long list of relevant outcome domains and reporting items from a systematic review of published neoSACT studies and interviews with key stakeholders. Identified items and domains will be categorised and formatted into Delphi consensus questionnaire items. (2) At least two rounds of an international online Delphi survey in which at least 250 key stakeholders (surgeons/oncologists/radiologists/pathologists/trialists/methodologists) will score the importance of reporting each outcome. (3) A consensus meeting with key stakeholders to discuss and agree the final COS and reporting guidance.

Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval for the consensus process will be obtained from the Queen’s University Belfast Faculty Ethics Committee. The COS/reporting guidelines will be presented at international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. Dissemination materials will be produced in collaboration with our steering group and patient advocates so the results can be shared widely.

Registration The study has been prospectively registered on the COMET website (https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2854).


Original languageEnglish
Article numbere084488
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ Open
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Female
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • Breast Neoplasms/therapy
  • Quality of Life
  • Research Design
  • Delphi Technique
  • Endpoint Determination
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Protocol for the development of a core outcome set and reporting guidelines for locoregional treatment in neoadjuvant systemic breast cancer treatment trials: the PRECEDENT project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this