Public ICT innovations: a strategic ambiguity perspective

M. N. Ravishankar*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public Information and Communications Technology (ICT) innovations are seen as having the potential to usher in a new era of technology-enabled models of governance in emerging economies. While it may be desirable for the implementation of such innovations to be underpinned by precise planning, structure and clarity, policy implementers in emerging economies are confronted instead by situations where ambiguous goals and means are standard. This paper considers high levels of ambiguity as a relatively enduring and intrinsic aspect of public ICT innovations in emerging economies. Drawing on an ethnographic study of Bangalore one, an innovative public ICT project implemented in Bangalore, India, the paper examines how strategic ambiguity is deployed by key public actors to chart the course of the implementation process and to steer it towards reasonable outcomes. Theoretically, the paper suggests that although strategic ambiguity is a precarious and unsettling condition in general, it can work effectively in contexts that are reasonably tolerant of ambiguous norms. The findings of the study also present arguments for why evaluation mechanisms need to be fundamentally reframed in order to assess the extent of implementation success of public ICT innovations in emerging economies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)316-332
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Information Technology
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ethnography
  • India
  • public ICT innovations
  • strategic ambiguity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Strategy and Management
  • Library and Information Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Public ICT innovations: a strategic ambiguity perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this