Abstract
Background
Oral health is a key contributor to a person's overall health. Previous studies indicate that oral health deteriorates throughout ventilation and may contribute to the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Oral health at the time of initial ventilation may impact on this deterioration.
Aims
To determine the quantitative clinical assessment methods used to measure oral health and what is currently known regarding the oral health of patients at the time of initial ventilation.
Study Design
A systematic literature search using electronic bibliographic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library was undertaken for this scoping review. Studies were included if patients were >18 years old and mechanically ventilated for <48 h at the time of the first oral assessment.
Results
In total, 12 studies were included. The review demonstrates a limited understanding of clinical oral health at the time of initial ventilation. Significant variation in both assessment methods and reporting of oral health makes comparison of results difficult resulting in a poor overall understanding of oral health at the time of intubation.
Conclusion
Standardized assessment and reporting methods may improve clinical application of findings and help direct future research. We suggest developing a core outcome set to ensure consistent use of assessment tools as well as standardized reporting of results.
Relevance to Clinical Practice
It is essential that a good understanding of oral health at the time of initial ventilation is gained so that patients receive more targeted oral hygiene intervention in ICU, potentially leading to improved patient outcomes.
Oral health is a key contributor to a person's overall health. Previous studies indicate that oral health deteriorates throughout ventilation and may contribute to the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Oral health at the time of initial ventilation may impact on this deterioration.
Aims
To determine the quantitative clinical assessment methods used to measure oral health and what is currently known regarding the oral health of patients at the time of initial ventilation.
Study Design
A systematic literature search using electronic bibliographic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library was undertaken for this scoping review. Studies were included if patients were >18 years old and mechanically ventilated for <48 h at the time of the first oral assessment.
Results
In total, 12 studies were included. The review demonstrates a limited understanding of clinical oral health at the time of initial ventilation. Significant variation in both assessment methods and reporting of oral health makes comparison of results difficult resulting in a poor overall understanding of oral health at the time of intubation.
Conclusion
Standardized assessment and reporting methods may improve clinical application of findings and help direct future research. We suggest developing a core outcome set to ensure consistent use of assessment tools as well as standardized reporting of results.
Relevance to Clinical Practice
It is essential that a good understanding of oral health at the time of initial ventilation is gained so that patients receive more targeted oral hygiene intervention in ICU, potentially leading to improved patient outcomes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 756-772 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Nursing in Critical Care |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 30 Jun 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2023 |
Keywords
- LITERATURE REVIEW
- LITERATURE REVIEWS
- mechanical ventilation
- oral health
- Critical Care Nursing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative oral health assessments in mechanically ventilated patients: a scoping review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Student theses
-
Poor oral health and ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP); is there a link?
Causey, C. (Author), Lundy, F. (Supervisor), El Karim, I. (Supervisor) & McAuley, D. (Supervisor), Dec 2023Student thesis: Masters Thesis › Master of Philosophy
File