Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Radio frequency fingerprints vs. physical unclonable functions - are they twins, competitors or allies?

  • Junqing Zhang*
  • , Chip Hong Chang
  • , Chongyan Gu
  • , Lajos Hanzo
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

335 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Privacy breaches and online frauds are grave concerns in pervasive computing. Device identification is the first line of defense to detect and stop fraud. Conventional device authentication schemes using software addresses as identities or static pre-programmed secret keys are vulnerable to tampering and memory attacks. This article reviews two emerging lightweight hardware-oriented solutions to avoid these problems, namely radio frequency fingerprint (RFF) identification and physical unclonable function (PUF) authentication. Their operating principles and protocols are first introduced, followed by a scrutiny of their common and distinctive features, and a discussion of the stumbling blocks in the way of their market adoption. Finally, we envisage a combined mutual authentication and key establishment scheme to shed light on their synergy.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages9
JournalIEEE Network
Early online date25 Jul 2022
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 25 Jul 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Radio frequency fingerprints vs. physical unclonable functions - are they twins, competitors or allies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this