Abstract
This paper introduces the discrete choice model-paradigm of Random Regret Minimization (RRM) to the field of environmental and resource economics. The RRM-approach has been very recently developed in the context of travel demand modelling and presents a tractable, regret-based alternative to the dominant choice-modelling paradigm based on Random Utility Maximization-theory (RUM-theory). We highlight how RRM-based models provide closed form, logit-type formulations for choice probabilities that allow for capturing semi-compensatory behaviour and choice set-composition effects while being equally parsimonious as their utilitarian counterparts. Using data from a Stated Choice-experiment aimed at identifying valuations of characteristics of nature parks, we compare RRM-based models and RUM-based models in terms of parameter estimates, goodness of fit, elasticities and consequential policy implications.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 413-429 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Environmental & resource economics |
Volume | 51 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 08 Sept 2011 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- random regret minimization
- environmental and resource economics
- preference analysis
- choice behaviour
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Aerospace Engineering