Abstract
Although systematic reviews are the method of choice to synthesize scientific evidence, they can take years to complete and publish. Clinicians, managers, and policy-makers often need input from scientific evidence in a more timely and resource-efficient manner. For this purpose, rapid reviews are conducted. Rapid reviews are performed using an accelerated process. However, they should not be less systematic than standard systematic reviews, and the introduction of bias must be avoided. In this article, we describe what rapid reviews are, present their characteristics, give some examples, highlight potential pitfalls, and draw attention to the importance of evidence summaries in order to facilitate adoption in clinical decision-making.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 515-519 |
Journal | European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 19 May 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2021 |
Keywords
- Decision-making
- Evidence summaries
- Evidence-based healthcare
- Rapid reviews
- Research methods
- Systematic reviews