RAS mutations and cetuximab in locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the EXPERT-C trial.

F. Sclafani, D. Gonzalez, D. Cunningham, S. Hulkki Wilson, C. Peckitt, J. Giralt, B. Glimelius, S. Roselló Keränen, A. Wotherspoon, G. Brown, D. Tait, J. Oates, I. Chau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: RAS mutations predict resistance to anti-epidermal growthfactor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer. We analysed RAS mutations in 30 non-metastatic rectal cancer patients treated with or without cetuximab within the 31 EXPERT-C trial.

Methods: Ninety of 149 patients with tumours available for analysis were KRAS/BRAF wild-type, and randomly assigned to capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) followed by chemoradiotherapy, surgery and adjuvant CAPOX or the same regimen plus cetuximab (CAPOX-C). Of these, four had a mutation of NRAS exon 3, and 84 were retrospectively analysed for additional KRAS (exon 4) and NRAS (exons 2/4) mutations by using bi-directional Sanger sequencing. The effect of cetuximab on study end-points in the RAS wild-type population was analysed.

Results: Eleven (13%) of 84 patients initially classified as KRAS/BRAF wild-type were found to have a mutation in KRAS exon 4 (11%) or NRAS exons 2/4 (2%). Overall, 78/149 (52%) assessable patients were RAS wild-type (CAPOX, n = 40; CAPOX-C, n = 38). In this population, after a median follow-up of 63.8 months, in line with the initial analysis, the addition of cetuximab was associated with numerically higher, but not statistically significant, rates of complete response (15.8% versus 7.5%, p = 0.31), 5-year progression-free survival (75.5% versus 67.5%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.61, p = 0.25) and 5-year overall survival (83.8% versus 70%, HR 0.54, p = 0.20).

Conclusions: RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2 and 3 were identified in 17% of locally advanced rectal cancer patients. Given the small sample size, no definitive conclusions on the effect of additional RAS mutations on cetuximab treatment in this setting can be drawn and further investigation of RAS in larger studies is warranted.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1430-1436
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume50
Issue number8
Early online date28 Feb 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

Keywords

  • BRAF
  • Cetuximab
  • KRAS
  • NRAS
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • RAS
  • Rectal cancer
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
  • Capecitabine
  • Chemoradiotherapy
  • Deoxycytidine
  • Female
  • Fluorouracil
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mutation
  • Organoplatinum Compounds
  • Rectal Neoplasms
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome
  • ras Proteins

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'RAS mutations and cetuximab in locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the EXPERT-C trial.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this