Activities per year
Abstract
Post-polypectomy surveillance is a cornerstone of colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention, yet current reliance on colonoscopy poses challenges related to capacity, patient burden, and adherence.
Amid growing interest in non-invasive strategies, this review evaluates the diagnostic performance, clinical applicability, and limitations of emerging alternatives, including faecal immunochemical testing (FIT), multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA), CT colonography (CTC), circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), and colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), in the context of post-polypectomy surveillance. While FIT remains widely endorsed for low-risk populations, its limited sensitivity for flat adenomas and serrated lesions constrains its utility. mt-sDNA and CTC offer incremental improvements in detection but face cost-effectiveness, false-positive, and guideline limitations in surveillance. ctDNA holds promise for recurrence monitoring in high-risk CRC but remains investigational for adenoma surveillance. Evidence for CCE as a triage tool is emerging, though concerns persist regarding incomplete examinations, cost, and residual risk.
Importantly, substantial heterogeneity in surveillance guidelines and suboptimal real-world adherence complicate evaluation and implementation of these modalities. Integration of molecular biomarkers and risk-adaptive strategies may support more personalised follow-up. However, robust comparative effectiveness studies that account for system-level and behavioural factors are essential to guide appropriate adoption. Non-invasive tools remain complementary, not yet replacements, for colonoscopy in post-polypectomy care.
Amid growing interest in non-invasive strategies, this review evaluates the diagnostic performance, clinical applicability, and limitations of emerging alternatives, including faecal immunochemical testing (FIT), multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA), CT colonography (CTC), circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), and colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), in the context of post-polypectomy surveillance. While FIT remains widely endorsed for low-risk populations, its limited sensitivity for flat adenomas and serrated lesions constrains its utility. mt-sDNA and CTC offer incremental improvements in detection but face cost-effectiveness, false-positive, and guideline limitations in surveillance. ctDNA holds promise for recurrence monitoring in high-risk CRC but remains investigational for adenoma surveillance. Evidence for CCE as a triage tool is emerging, though concerns persist regarding incomplete examinations, cost, and residual risk.
Importantly, substantial heterogeneity in surveillance guidelines and suboptimal real-world adherence complicate evaluation and implementation of these modalities. Integration of molecular biomarkers and risk-adaptive strategies may support more personalised follow-up. However, robust comparative effectiveness studies that account for system-level and behavioural factors are essential to guide appropriate adoption. Non-invasive tools remain complementary, not yet replacements, for colonoscopy in post-polypectomy care.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 102092 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology |
| Volume | 80 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Feb 2026 |
Publications and Copyright Policy
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Surveillance
- Post Polypectomy
- Non-invasive methods
- Colorectal cancer risk
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Colorectal Adenomas
- POLYPECTOMY
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Re-evaluating post-polypectomy surveillance: the role of non-invasive modalities in colorectal cancer prevention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Activities
- 1 Membership of board
-
Bowel Cancer UK (External organisation)
McFerran, E. (Advisor)
05 Oct 2026 → …Activity: Membership types › Membership of board
-
A comparison of international modeling methods for evaluating health economics of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review
Adair, O., Lamrock, F., O'Mahony, J. F., Lawler, M. & McFerran, E., May 2025, In: Value in Health. 28, 5, p. 790-799 10 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
Open AccessFile3 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)152 Downloads (Pure) -
Microscopic pathology assessment of colorectal polyp size is less accurate than intracolonoscopic assessment
Loughrey, M. B., 28 Mar 2024, (Early online date) In: Gut.Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review
2 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus) -
A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening in Europe: have studies included optimal screening intensities?
Pokharel, R., Lin, Y.-S., McFerran, E. & O'Mahony, J. F., Sept 2023, In: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 21, p. 701–717Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile22 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)102 Downloads (Pure)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver