Recommendations from Cochrane reviews for improving future trials on anesthesia and pain: a meta-research study

Renata Runjic, Mia Plenkovic, Stefania Pirosca, Mike Clarke, Shaun Treweek, Livia Puljak*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) have a section ‘Implications for research’ where authors make suggestions for improving future research. The authors of the present study assessed the prevalence and time dynamics of different recommendations in the CSRs about anesthesia and pain. Methods: The authors included all CSRs published by the Cochrane Anaesthesia Group and Cochrane Pain and Palliative Care Group before 17 July 2020. The authors analyzed recommendations for improving future research listed in the ‘Implications for research’ section of these CSRs and categorized recommendations for improvements. Results: They analyzed 370 reviews. Four categories of recommendations were present in more than 40% of the reviews. Most reviews recommended a larger sample size and better outcome choice, study design and choice of future intervention. These recommendations gradually increased in frequency in the Cochrane Pain and Palliative Care Group and mainly decreased in the Cochrane Anaesthesia Group. Conclusion: Recommendations from CSRs offer useful advice for trialists designing new trials.


Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)669-677
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Volume11
Issue number9
Early online date13 May 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Research Article
  • anesthesia
  • Cochrane systematic review
  • implications for research
  • pain

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recommendations from Cochrane reviews for improving future trials on anesthesia and pain: a meta-research study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this