Reconciliation in international human rights law: perceptions, principles and practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between reconciliation and international human rights law by analysing the case law and reports of international courts and human rights treaty bodies in light of multidisciplinary theory on reconciliation. It establishes that human rights institutions see reconciliation as a complex objective that should entail: the restoration of horizontal and vertical relationships; inclusivity in the design and implementation of measures to deal with the past; independent investigations and acknowledgement of past harms; and meaningful efforts to understand and address the root causes of conflict. Having established this theoretical and legal framework for the advancement of “thicker” reconciliation, the article critically examines the work of the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery (ICRIR) in Northern Ireland. It argues that challenges arising from its controversial origins as well as limitations in its remit and power substantially curb its ability to advance human-rights based reconciliation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)150-177
JournalEuropean Human Rights Law Review
Volume2
Publication statusPublished - 01 Apr 2025

Publications and Copyright Policy

This work is licensed under Queen’s Research Publications and Copyright Policy.



Keywords

  • human rights law
  • international human rights law
  • Reconciliation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reconciliation in international human rights law: perceptions, principles and practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this