Reforming the C-DSM Reform: A User-Based Copyright Theory for Commonplace Creativity

Giancarlo Frosio*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A few years ago, Neelie Kroes warned that because of ill-adapted laws to technological development, “every day citizens […] across the EU break the law just to do something commonplace”. According to Kroes, the Single Market “cried out” for copyright reform. Finally, the EU responded to that call for reform but, unfortunately, with the wrong answer. As part of its recent reform to adapt copyright to the Digital Single Market (DSM), the EU Parliament has approved Art. 17 of the Copyright in the DSM Directive, which might dismantle the traditional knowledge and take-down system, while imposing enhanced liability on user-generated content (UGC) platforms, which might incentivize proactive censorship and cripple competition. Article 17 tells the story of a dream of change where ill-adapted laws that citizens break “just to do something commonplace” no longer exist that instead awakes to a reality of unfulfilled expectations. Instead of being guided by a welfare or cultural approach where citizens’ interests and fundamental rights take centre stage, outdated fairness and personality approaches dominate the policy discourse, emphasizing rightholders’ interests and seeking cooperation with online service providers to the detriment of users. Instead of changing the law so that it is legal and easier for users “to do something commonplace”, legislators have engineered the law so that online gatekeepers have an incentive to prevent, block, filter and sanitize proactively that commonplace digital creativity. In contrast, copyright reform in the digital environment should build upon the DSM Directive licensing emphasis by launching a coordinated approach that should focus on creators’ compensation, rather than exclusive rights, and include (1) exceptions and limitations that might serve as a basis for (2) fair compensation (3) through statutory/compulsory, collective and extended licensing mechanisms (4) collected through a levy system (5) that might leverage income from online-platform advertising.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)709-750
Number of pages42
JournalIIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Volume51
Issue number6
Early online date09 Apr 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jul 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and supported within the framework of a subsidy by the Russian Academic Excellence Project “5-100”. Many thanks to Marco Ricolfi and Marco Ciurcina for comments on earlier drafts of this article.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich.

Keywords

  • Collective management
  • Compulsory licensing
  • Copyright
  • Digital Single Market
  • Licensing
  • Platform economy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reforming the C-DSM Reform: A User-Based Copyright Theory for Commonplace Creativity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this