Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Consequentialist Moral Thinking

Jared Piazza, Paulo Sousa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Citations (Scopus)


Three studies demonstrated that the moral judgments of religious individuals and political conservatives are highly insensitive to consequentialist (i.e., outcome-based) considerations. In Study 1, both religiosity and political conservatism predicted a resistance toward consequentialist thinking concerning a range of transgressive acts, independent of other relevant dispositional factors (e.g., disgust sensitivity). Study 2 ruled out differences in welfare sensitivity as an explanation for these findings. In Study 3, religiosity and political conservatism predicted a commitment to judging “harmless” taboo violations morally impermissible, rather than discretionary, despite the lack of negative consequences rising from the act. Furthermore, non-consequentialist thinking style was shown to mediate the relationship religiosity/conservatism had with impermissibility judgments, while intuitive thinking style did not. These data provide further evidence for the influence of religious and political commitments in motivating divergent moral judgments, while highlighting a new dispositional factor, non-consequentialist thinking style, as a mediator of these effects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)334-342
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Issue number3
Early online date13 May 2013
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Consequentialist Moral Thinking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this