Abstract
Open science principles increasingly demand that research data be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR), yet cybersecurity research, particularly malware analysis and threat intelligence, exists in a paradox. The artifacts that underpin reproducible research are the very materials that could enable harm if openly shared. This proposal presents an initial open question at the intersection of open science and cybersecurity research. The main aim is to promote dialogue within the community on developing repository practices, ethical frameworks, and technical architectures that balance legitimate research needs against security risks, asking: how can repositories be "open to all" when the data itself can be weaponised?
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Accepted - 28 Feb 2026 |
| Event | Open Repositories 2026: The 21st Open Repositories Conference (OR 2026) - Online Duration: 08 Jun 2026 → 11 Jun 2026 https://or2026.openrepositories.org/ |
Conference
| Conference | Open Repositories 2026 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | OR'26 |
| Period | 08/06/2026 → 11/06/2026 |
| Internet address |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Repository practices for the dark arts: when openness conflicts with safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver