Representational Similarity Analysis Reveals Commonalities and Differences in the Semantic Processing of Words and Objects

Barry J. Devereux, Alex Clarke, Andreas Marouchos, Lorraine K. Tyler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

86 Citations (Scopus)


Understanding the meanings of words and objects requires the activation of underlying conceptual representations. Semantic representations are often assumed to be coded such that meaning is evoked regardless of the input modality. However, the extent to which meaning is coded in modality-independent or amodal systems remains controversial. We address this issue in a human fMRI study investigating the neural processing of concepts, presented separately as written words and pictures. Activation maps for each individual word and picture were used as input for searchlight-based multivoxel pattern analyses. Representational similarity analysis was used to identify regions correlating with low-level visual models of the words and objects and the semantic category structure common to both. Common semantic category effects for both modalities were found in a left-lateralized network, including left posterior middle temporal gyrus (LpMTG), left angular gyrus, and left intraparietal sulcus (LIPS), in addition to object- and word-specific semantic processing in ventral temporal cortex and more anterior MTG, respectively. To explore differences in representational content across regions and modalities, we developed novel data-driven analyses, based on k-means clustering of searchlight dissimilarity matrices and seeded correlation analysis. These revealed subtle differences in the representations in semantic-sensitive regions, with representations in LIPS being relatively invariant to stimulus modality and representations in LpMTG being uncorrelated across modality. These results suggest that, although both LpMTG and LIPS are involved in semantic processing, only the functional role of LIPS is the same regardless of the visual input, whereas the functional role of LpMTG differs for words and objects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18906-18916
Number of pages11
JournalThe Journal of Neuroscience
Issue number48
Publication statusPublished - 01 Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

bibtex: devereux2013a


Dive into the research topics of 'Representational Similarity Analysis Reveals Commonalities and Differences in the Semantic Processing of Words and Objects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this