Respecting autonomy without disclosing information

Tom Walker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)


    There is widespread agreement that it would be both morally and legally wrong to treat a competent patient, or to carry out research with a competent participant, without the voluntary consent of that patient or research participant. Furthermore, in medical ethics it is generally taken that that consent must be informed. The most widely given reason for this has been that informed consent is needed to respect the patient’s or research participant’s autonomy. In this article I set out to challenge this claim by considering in detail each of the three most prominent ways in which ‘autonomy’ has been conceptualized in the medical ethics literature. I will argue that whilst these accounts support the claim that consent is needed if the treatment of competent patients, or research on competent individuals, is to respect their autonomy, they do not support the claim that informed consent is needed for this purpose.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)388-394
    Number of pages7
    Issue number7
    Early online date10 Apr 2012
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Philosophy
    • Health(social science)
    • Health Policy


    Dive into the research topics of 'Respecting autonomy without disclosing information'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this