Response shift in the assessment of quality of life among people attending cardiac rehabilitation

Martin Dempster, Rosa Carney, Roger McClements

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
262 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives. To examine whether any response shift in quality of life (QoL) assessment over the course of a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme could be explained by changes in individuals' internal standards (recalibration), values (reprioritization), and/or conceptualization of QoL and the extent to which any response shift could be explained by health locus of control, optimism, and coping strategy.

Design. Longitudinal survey design.

Methods. The schedule for evaluation of individual QoL-direct weighting (SEIQoL-DW) was administered at the beginning and end of a CR programme. At the end of the programme, the SEIQoL-DW then-test was also administered to measure response shift. A total of 57 participants completed these measures and other measures to assess health locus of control, optimism, and coping.

Results. Response shift effects were observed in this population mainly due to recalibration. When response shift was incorporated into the analysis of QoL a larger treatment effect was observed. Active coping as a mechanism in the response shift model was found to have a significant positive correlation with response shift.

Conclusion. This study showed that response shift occurs during CR. The occurrence of response shift in QoL ratings over time for this population could have implications for the estimation of the effectiveness of the intervention.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-319
Number of pages13
JournalBritish Journal of Health Psychology
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 May 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response shift in the assessment of quality of life among people attending cardiac rehabilitation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this