Rethinking Prison Disciplinary Processes: A Potential Future for Restorative Justice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)
915 Downloads (Pure)


The movement for restorative justice (RJ) has struggled with marginalization on the soft end of the criminal justice system where the threat of net widening and iatrogenesis looms large. To realize the full potential of RJ as an alternative philosophy of justice, restorative practices need to expand beyond the world of adolescent and small-level offences into the deeper end of the justice system. Disciplinary hearings inside of adult prisons may be a strategic space to advance this expansion. This paper presents findings from a study of prison discipline in four UK prisons. The findings strongly suggest that in their current form, such disciplinary proceedings are viewed by prisoners as lacking in legitimacy. Although modelled after the adversarial system of the criminal court, the adjudications were instead universally derided as ‘kangaroo courts’, lacking in the basic elements of procedural justice. Based on these findings, we argue that restorative justice interventions may offer a viable redress to these problems of legitimacy which, if successful, would have ramifications that extend well beyond the prison walls.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)126-148
Number of pages23
JournalVictims and Offenders
Issue number1
Early online date30 Dec 2015
Publication statusPublished - 2016


  • Restorative Justice
  • Legitimacy
  • Procedural Justice
  • Prison Discipline
  • Prison Misconduct


Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking Prison Disciplinary Processes: A Potential Future for Restorative Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this