Reticence, gender, and deindustrialisation: oral history challenges emerging within deindustrialisation studies and labour history

Shonagh L. Joice*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article presents a reflective review of the challenges of interviewing hard-to-reach and marginalised groups when employing an oral history methodology. Using Belfast, Northern Ireland, as a case study, the article reflects on the significance of social and cultural markers that must be contended with, and argues for the importance of responsible research in response to instances of reticence. In addition, this article reviews the challenges faced by the author with regards to the gendered dimensions of deindustrialisation studies, particularly when interviewing women about the familial experiences of the deindustrialisation of heavy industry. The article advocates for compassionate approaches within an oral history methodology, particularly in post-conflict societies where unresolved trauma and complex ethno-cultural identities exist. Considering such issues, offers an opportunity to reenergise and expand the scope of labour history and deindustrialisation studies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)419-431
JournalLabor History
Volume65
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Feb 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reticence, gender, and deindustrialisation: oral history challenges emerging within deindustrialisation studies and labour history'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this