Reviewing the Reviewability of  the Attorney General for Northern Ireland

Conor McCormick

Reviewing the Reviewability of the Attorney General for Northern Ireland

Conor McCormick

School of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

257 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Discusses whether courts are increasingly willing to allow judicial review of decisions of the Attorney General for Northern Ireland. Examines why such decisions were generally non-reviewable before 2010, and subsequent cases indicating a greater openness to reviewability. Suggests why reviewability may now be determined by the grounds of review and the function being challenged.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	22-30
Number of pages	9
Journal	Public Law
Publication status	Published - 31 Jan 2018

Keywords

Judicial review
Attorney General for Northern Ireland
Northern Ireland

Access to Document

Conor McCormick - Reviewing the Reviewability of the Attorney General for Northern Ireland
© 2017 Thomson Reuters (Professional) UK Limited and contributors. This manuscript is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction for non-commercial purposes, provided the author and source are cited.
Accepted author manuscript, 147 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{b94161ad02f841ebb63a5ea5b85027e2,

title = "Reviewing the Reviewability of the Attorney General for Northern Ireland",

abstract = "Discusses whether courts are increasingly willing to allow judicial review of decisions of the Attorney General for Northern Ireland. Examines why such decisions were generally non-reviewable before 2010, and subsequent cases indicating a greater openness to reviewability. Suggests why reviewability may now be determined by the grounds of review and the function being challenged.",

keywords = "Judicial review, Attorney General for Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland",

author = "Conor McCormick",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

day = "31",

language = "English",

pages = "22--30",

journal = "Public Law",

issn = "0033-3565",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell-Thomson Reuters",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reviewing the Reviewability of the Attorney General for Northern Ireland

AU - McCormick, Conor

PY - 2018/1/31

Y1 - 2018/1/31

N2 - Discusses whether courts are increasingly willing to allow judicial review of decisions of the Attorney General for Northern Ireland. Examines why such decisions were generally non-reviewable before 2010, and subsequent cases indicating a greater openness to reviewability. Suggests why reviewability may now be determined by the grounds of review and the function being challenged.

AB - Discusses whether courts are increasingly willing to allow judicial review of decisions of the Attorney General for Northern Ireland. Examines why such decisions were generally non-reviewable before 2010, and subsequent cases indicating a greater openness to reviewability. Suggests why reviewability may now be determined by the grounds of review and the function being challenged.

KW - Judicial review

KW - Attorney General for Northern Ireland

KW - Northern Ireland

M3 - Article

SN - 0033-3565

SP - 22

EP - 30

JO - Public Law

JF - Public Law

ER -

Reviewing the Reviewability of the Attorney General for Northern Ireland

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this