Abstract
ABSTRACT Mary Midgley asserts that my argument concerning the problem of child‐abuse was inappropriately framed in the language of rights, and neglected certain pertinent natural facts. I defend the view that the use of rights‐talk was both apposite and did not misrepresent the moral problem in question. I assess the status and character of the natural facts Midgley adduces in criticism of my case, concluding that they do not obviously establish the conclusions she believes they do. Finally I briefly respond to the charge that my suggestions were illiberal.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 99-104 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Journal of Applied Philosophy |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 01 Jan 1992 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy