Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rojiroti microfinance and child nutrition: a cluster randomised trial: A cluster randomised trial

  • Shalini Ojha
  • , Lisa Szatkowski
  • , Ranjeet Sinha
  • , Gil Yaron
  • , Andrew Fogarty
  • , Stephen John Allen
  • , Sunil Choudhary
  • , Alan Robert Smyth*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether Rojiroti microfinance, for poor Indian women, improves child nutrition. 

Design: Cluster randomised trial. 

Setting: Tolas (village communities) in Bihar State. 

Participants: Women and children under 5 years. 

Interventions: With Rojiroti microfinance, women form self-help groups and save their money to provide loans to group members. After 6 months, they receive larger external loans. Tolas were randomised to receive Rojiroti immediately or after 18 months. 

Outcome measures: The primary analysis compared the mean weight for height Z score (WHZ) of children under 5 years in the intervention versus control tolas who attended for weight and height measurement 18 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes were weight for age Z score (WAZ), height for age Z score, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), wasting, underweight and stunting. 

Results: We randomised 28 tolas to each arm and collected data from 2469 children (1560 mothers) at baseline and 2064 children (1326 mothers) at follow-up. WHZ was calculated for 1718 children at baseline and 1377 (674 intervention and 703 control) at follow-up. At 18 months, mean WHZ was significantly higher for intervention (-1.02) versus controls (-1.37; regression coefficient adjusted for clustering β=0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.61, p=0.001). Significantly fewer children were wasted in the intervention group (122, 18%) versus control (200, 29%; OR=0.46, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.74, p=0.002). Mean WAZ was better in the intervention group (-2.13 vs-2.37; β=0.27, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.43, p=0.001) as was MUAC (13.6 cm vs 13.4 cm; β=0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.40, p=0.02). In an analysis adjusting for baseline nutritional measures (259 intervention children and 300 control), only WAZ and % underweight showed significant differences in favour of the intervention. 

Conclusion: In marginalised communities in rural India, child nutrition was better in those who received Rojiroti microfinance, compared with controls. 

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-235
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Disease in Childhood
Volume105
Issue number3
Early online date10 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Mar 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding This work was supported by the Medical Research Council; Wellcome Trust; the Department of Health and Social Care; and Department for International Development (both UK Government) as part of the joint global health trials scheme (grant number MR/M021904/1). The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  3. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

Keywords

  • child growth
  • low & middle income countries
  • microfinance
  • wasting
  • weight for height z score

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rojiroti microfinance and child nutrition: a cluster randomised trial: A cluster randomised trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this