Sentencing: R. v McLaughlin (Anthony) (Case Comment)

John Taggart

Sentencing: R. v McLaughlin (Anthony) (Case Comment)

John Taggart

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

138 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Comments on R. v McLaughlin (CA (NI)) on whether a judge erred in imposing a total of three years' imprisonment for sexual assaults and sexual activity with a person with a mental disorder impeding choice, considering the appellant's "uniqueness" argument based on both parties' mental conditions.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	705-708
Journal	Criminal Law Review
Volume	2022
Issue number	8
Publication status	Published - 01 Aug 2022
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

Sentencing: R. v McLaughlin (Anthony) (Case Comment)
Copyright 2022 Thomson Reuters. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Accepted author manuscript, 84.4 KBLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{ac445bef967a429e80905907a20328a1,

title = "Sentencing: R. v McLaughlin (Anthony) (Case Comment)",

abstract = "Comments on R. v McLaughlin (CA (NI)) on whether a judge erred in imposing a total of three years' imprisonment for sexual assaults and sexual activity with a person with a mental disorder impeding choice, considering the appellant's {"}uniqueness{"} argument based on both parties' mental conditions.",

author = "John Taggart",

year = "2022",

month = aug,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "2022",

pages = "705--708",

journal = "Criminal Law Review",

issn = "0011-135X",

publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell-Thomson Reuters",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sentencing: R. v McLaughlin (Anthony) (Case Comment)

AU - Taggart, John

PY - 2022/8/1

Y1 - 2022/8/1

N2 - Comments on R. v McLaughlin (CA (NI)) on whether a judge erred in imposing a total of three years' imprisonment for sexual assaults and sexual activity with a person with a mental disorder impeding choice, considering the appellant's "uniqueness" argument based on both parties' mental conditions.

AB - Comments on R. v McLaughlin (CA (NI)) on whether a judge erred in imposing a total of three years' imprisonment for sexual assaults and sexual activity with a person with a mental disorder impeding choice, considering the appellant's "uniqueness" argument based on both parties' mental conditions.

M3 - Article

SN - 0011-135X

VL - 2022

SP - 705

EP - 708

JO - Criminal Law Review

JF - Criminal Law Review

IS - 8

ER -

Sentencing: R. v McLaughlin (Anthony) (Case Comment)

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this