Shame on EU? Europe, RtoP, and the Politics of Refugee Protection

Daniel Bulley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)
758 Downloads (Pure)


The EU’s politics of protecting refugees through deals such as that recently struck with Turkey have been vilified by human rights campaigners. This article asks whether a full engagement with RtoP could offer the EU a way out of its current ethical and political malaise. It argues against such a proposition for two reasons. First, the EU already proclaims a long list of values, an institutional ethos, which it argues both found and guide its actions; the addition of RtoP, which contains no obligations to protect refugees in other territories, would add little. Second, when the logic underlying the EU and RtoP’s politics of protection are examined, a similarity emerges which would make such supplementation redundant. Both are primarily organised around a solidarity with, and a bolstering of, the sovereign capacity of the modern state. All that is offered to refugees, and other suffering populations, is a minimalist humanitarian solidarity through the ‘outsourcing’ of protection. Neither Europe’s ethos nor RtoP can therefore provide the firm ethical grounds from which to build protection for the figure most clearly failed by modern states – the refugee.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-70
Number of pages20
JournalEthics and International Affairs
Issue number1
Early online date10 Mar 2017
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'Shame on EU? Europe, RtoP, and the Politics of Refugee Protection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this