Abstract
The common ingroup identity model (CIIM) holds that viewing former outgroup members as part of a larger shared ingroup can allow social categorisation to be harnessed for social cohesion. The ingroup projection model (IPM) suggests that even where shared identification occurs, social divisions can be transposed into superordinate groups. Here we explore the potentially inclusive national identity in a region (Northern Ireland) which has historically seen a high polarisation of identities. Using three data sets (N = 2000; N = 359; N = 1179), we examine the extent to which a superordinate inclusive national identity, Northern Irish, is related to conciliatory attitudes. We find a common ingroup identity is linked to more positive social attitudes but not to more positive political attitudes. We conclude by considering the complexities of applying psychological models in the real world where structural and historical social divisions and vexing oppositional political questions can be transposed into new social and political orders.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 602-616 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Group Processes & Intergroup Relations |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 27 Mar 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2014 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- national identity
- peace and conflict
- political attitudes
- superordinate identity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Cultural Studies
- Communication
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Sociology and Political Science